Listen, I'm not calling anyone out of their names. But the point still stands. Your refutation to what I said is not really a refutation at all.
The fact of the matter is that, at the end of the day, a principled loser is still a loser. What's so hard to understand about that?
What good is a loser to the game? If you are not in office, it doesn't matter what you believe.
If you think that's calling you and yours out of your name, I can't help that. It's not my intention, but I still can't help it.
A principled loser is still a loser.
Look at it the other way:
What good is it to get "your guy" elected, if all he does is damage? Think about it. Winning elections is great. But holding office is but a means to an end. If your 'end' is limited, constitutional government, even if "your guy" wins, you still have lost, every bit as much I have.