Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denver Judge Axes the Constitution - Update of Rick Stanley's 2A/Civil Disobedience Trial
The Stanley for U.S. Senate 2002 Colorado Campaign - News Release ^ | May 15, 2002 | Stanley for U.S. Senate 2002 - Colorado

Posted on 05/16/2002 3:05:12 AM PDT by LibertyRocks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-736 next last
Please forward this information to everyone you know... Whether Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green, Liberal, Conservative, Socialist... WHATEVER!

THIS is important for everyone in the country to know about. The newspapers in Colorado are NOT reporting on the real issues at stake in this trial. There was absolutely no testimony included in the article and as you read, the trial is not boring to say the least...

The media is not reporting about how the jury pool was so obviously fixed... I mean come on... 5 people out of 18 potential jurors work for the City - the Plaintiff?? AND we had a police officer??? In a city the size of Denver -- well over half a million people I find it hard to believe that the jury pool was a random sampling of the population!

Please support Rick through this trial. He is a true Patriot who loves his country. Read for yourself, visit the website: www.stanley2002.org

1 posted on 05/16/2002 3:05:13 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; Zon; MileHi;
Unbelievable!!!
2 posted on 05/16/2002 3:14:22 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
The Constitution is so dangerous it cannot even be named!
3 posted on 05/16/2002 3:15:48 AM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks; glasser; Verax
You've got to read this to believe it!
And even then you won't!
I can't believe they would be so blatant with their corruption...
4 posted on 05/16/2002 3:19:20 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks;bang_list;OWK;real saxophonist;harpseal;lazamataz;cap'n crunch
WTF?

I thought Maryland was screwed up...

5 posted on 05/16/2002 3:33:02 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
bump
6 posted on 05/16/2002 3:33:24 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
You are not to mention the Constitution during this proceeding. Do you understand?"

HOLY SH*T!!!

Spread the word!

7 posted on 05/16/2002 3:34:59 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
"Torquemada said, "Then I'll explain it again. You are not to reference the Constitution in these proceedings. You will not address it in voir dire, you will not address it in your opening remarks, you will not ask any questions about the Constitution when you summon your witnesses, and you will not talk about the Constitution when you give your closing arguments. Do you understand my instructions?", questioned Judge Torquemada. "
8 posted on 05/16/2002 3:37:40 AM PDT by Movemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Here's the court's contact info, if anyone's interested:

COUNTY COURT
1437 Bannock Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Phone: (720) 865-7800
Fax: (720) 865-8250
dccadmin@ci.denver.co.us


Patterson is an elected official and sits for a four year term. I'm affraid I don't know when he's next on the ballot. In the following pic, he is in the second row, second from the left (the black man). Click the picture to see his legal biography.

Photo of County Court Judges

9 posted on 05/16/2002 3:40:48 AM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Patterson said, "Then I'll explain it again. You are not to reference the Constitution in these proceedings. You will not address it in voir dire, you will not address it in your opening remarks, you will not ask any questions about the Constitution when you summon your witnesses, and you will not talk about the Constitution when you give your closing arguments. Do you understand my instructions?", questioned Judge Patterson.
Scalia is going to love this case.

-Eric

10 posted on 05/16/2002 3:41:44 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Bump for Justice!!!
11 posted on 05/16/2002 4:01:37 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Here's the coverage from the Rocky Mountain News.  I couldn't find anything in the Denver Post.  If it's on-line, I couldn't find it.
Libertarian's gun case goes to jury

Senate candidate says he put loaded gun in holster during rally to make a point

By Charlie Brennan,News Staff Writer
May 16, 2002

Jurors start deliberating today in Libertarian Senate candidate Rick Stanley's trial for openly carrying a gun in defiance of a Denver city ordinance, but they're not exactly faced with a whodunnit.

Stanley, owner of Denver's Stanley Fastener & Shop Supply, removed much of the suspense Wednesday when he testified toward the end of his 1 hour, 45 minute trial in Denver County Court.

Stanley admitted to the jury of five women and one man that he put a loaded Beretta .380 caliber semiautomatic handgun in his holster during a Dec. 15 rally at a downtown Denver park.

The rally marked the 210th birthday of the Bill of Rights, and Stanley said he wanted "to bring attention to a bad law that needs to be overturned."

Stanley also testified he wanted "to obtain standing, so that I can take it up through the court system, if we don't get this resolved (at trial) in favor of we, the people."

Stanley says the Denver ordinance contradicts the Colorado Constitution and the Second Amendment, which he sats grant permission to openly carry a deadly weapon.

Stanley, who has pleaded innocent to the misdemeanor charge, which could bring a year in jail and a $999 fine, offered jurors a second reason for carrying a gun.

As a candidate for the U.S. Senate, whose controversial views have riled many inside and outside the Libertarian Party, Stanley testified: "For the past year, I have been receiving threats over the Internet," adding that people using "five or six different monikers" had been harassing and threatening him.

In the week before the rally in a park at 1440 Lincoln St., Stanley testified, one of those people wrote that "He and I were going to introduce ourselves to one another" at the demonstration.

Asked by his attorney, Paul Grant, how he interpreted that message, Stanley said, "A threat."

Stanley's trial occurs against the backdrop of a political campaign in which he has invested $10,000.

He hopes to secure the Libertarian nomination to oppose U.S. Sen. Wayne Allard and likely Democratic challenger Tom Strickland this fall.

Only last month, Colorado Springs software engineer Steve D'Ippolito was pressed into the fray by Libertarians alarmed over Stanley's comments that some judge too extreme.

Among them is Stanley's contention that Allard should be tried for treason -- and hung, if found guilty -- for voting to pass the Patriot Act in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11.

Sandra Johnson, who garnered 22,000 votes as the Libertarian candidate for governor in 1998, said many Libertarians oppose Stanley because, "We don't want to be seen as the lunatic fringe."

The Libertarians will gather in Leadville Friday through Sunday to choose between Stanley and D'Ippolito, as well as other candidates for statewide office.


12 posted on 05/16/2002 4:06:08 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Welcome to the People's Republik of Colorado.
13 posted on 05/16/2002 4:08:03 AM PDT by 11B3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
The lawyer is as much a clown as his client. I hope they sanction the lawyer and fine the hell out of this Stanley clown.
14 posted on 05/16/2002 4:12:08 AM PDT by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Bump for the Constitution!
15 posted on 05/16/2002 4:36:26 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States, and the Colorado Constitution is, subordinate to the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the state of Colorado. By excluding these documents from his courtroom, Judge Patterson has decreed that he intends to rule by personal whim. No old charter written by a bunch of dead white European males, however revered by a bunch of know-nothing citizens who are good for nothing but paying his salary and cleaning his chambers, is going to get in his way as he determines what's best for all of us.

That is the coloration to give to this odious trial.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

16 posted on 05/16/2002 4:36:32 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
Spread the word!
17 posted on 05/16/2002 4:42:52 AM PDT by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; squantos; harpseal; pocat
You are not to mention the Constitution. Understand!
18 posted on 05/16/2002 4:54:23 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
"You are not to reference the Constitution in these proceedings. You will not address it in voir dire, you will not address it in your opening remarks, you will not ask any questions about the Constitution when you summon your witnesses, and you will not talk about the Constitution when you give your closing arguments. Do you understand my instructions?", questioned Judge Patterson.

When we have 'people' such as this on the bench, there can be little hope for either freedom or democracy.

19 posted on 05/16/2002 4:58:46 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fporretto
The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States, and the Colorado Constitution is, subordinate to the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of the state of Colorado.

If you mention them, we kill you. Got it?

20 posted on 05/16/2002 4:59:29 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 721-736 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson