Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stripper Mom: I'm Following The Bible
WorldNetDaily ^ | May 17, 2002

Posted on 05/17/2002 3:36:51 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee

Friday, May 17, 2002



Stripper mom: I'm following the Bible
Mother says high-paying job gives her time to teach daughter values


Posted: May 17, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

The mother of a 5-year-old California girl facing expulsion from the Christian school she attends acknowledges her job as a stripper is not one to be proud of, but says her work allows her time to follow the Bible by being a "hands-on" parent.

As WorldNetDaily reported yesterday, the mother, Christina Silvas, was called into a conference at Capital Christian School in Sacramento after school officials became aware that she works as a part-time strip-tease dancer at a local club.

Rick Cole, senior pastor of Capital Christian Church, which sponsors the school, and other staff members met with Silvas to discuss their contention that her occupation is in violation of an agreement with and commitment to the school philosophy that parents must sign before the children are admitted as students. Her daughter would have to be removed, she was told, if Silvas did not quit her job.

The officials offered to cover the girl's last month's tuition of $400 if Silvas would change jobs. They also offered to support Silvas both financially and spiritually, and to help her find a different job that was in keeping with the school's values. Silvas declined the offer.

As a requirement for admission, parents of prospective students must sign a "commitment" to support the philosophy of the school. That philosophy, in part, reads: "Emphasis is placed on learning about God and the truths of God's Word in relationship to man and his world; recognizing that the way to God comes through personal faith in Jesus Christ; and Christian maturity comes by application of the truths of the Bible in all areas of life." In signing the document, parents agree to maintain a "partnership" with the school "regarding the standards and criteria of a Christian learning structure that involves the entire family."

According to reporter George Franco of KOVR-TV, Silvas has retained legal counsel and is considering filing a motion for an immediate injunction to have the child remain in school while the mother continues to work as a stripper.

Last night, Cole and Silvas discussed the matter with Bill O'Reilly, host of "The O'Reilly Factor" on Fox News Channel.

"We have appealed to her to change her occupation," Cole told O'Reilly, adding that "God would bless" such a decision.

While Silvas said she agrees with the school's philosophy, she sidestepped the question of whether she considered her occupation a "sinful lifestyle."

"I am just doing it for a season," Silvas reasoned, adding, "I'm not proud of what I'm doing."

Silvas argued that since her job takes her away for only three days a week – the days her daughter, Abby, is with her father – she is therefore available to be "the one to teach [Abby] the Bible at home," thus upholding her commitment to partner with the school in her daughter's education.

"The Bible calls on parents to be hands-on," Silvas told O'Reilly. She sees her situation as better than that of a single mother who puts her child in daycare for several hours a day.

When asked if it was fair that the school's actions were, in effect, punishing the daughter, Cole put the responsibility for the expulsion on the mother.

"My concern is, who is the cause of this consequence?" he asked. "The consequence of [Silvas'] choice is affecting her daughter adversely."

None of the participants in the televised segment talked about the possibility of litigation. Silvas did mention, however, that she hoped to find a new job soon and that people outside Capital Christian Church had offered to help her find work.

Previous story:

Kindergartener's stripper-mom in church-school flap


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: christinesilvas; medianonsense; privateschool; strippermom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-460 next last
To: Nov3
Her mom made a stink about it and took it public, not the school. The mother made the choice. She bears the responsibilty for her daughter's pain, if any.
241 posted on 05/17/2002 8:39:26 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: GuillermoX
"I'd like to meet these supposed strippers who are "just doing it to earn money for college". I doubt they even exist, anywhere."

They do, take my word for it.

The problem is that a whole bunch of them realize that the short-term potential for earning big bucks that the strip game provides, does not exist in the majority of their chosen careers.

Then they decide to strip, "just a little while longer".

242 posted on 05/17/2002 8:40:27 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Illegal is irrelevant. We are discussing whether the ends justifies the means.

Oh look, I made a funny.

243 posted on 05/17/2002 8:42:23 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: ZinGirl
besides, it was a "what if" scenario...so there IS a comparison between drugs & stripping if you have a mom that decides that dealing drugs would bring in the kind of money she needs to stay home with her child. her attitude might be, 'hey, i may be dealing drugs, but at least I'm a stay-at-home mom and I'm not stripping for money...'. whereas stripper mom might be thinking, "yeah, I strip for money, but at least I'm not dealing drugs....that's illegal". whoopdee-do

In the if my aunt had balls category… What if the school was being duplicitous when it crafted the agreement knowing all the while if it ever got to a court of law the agreement wouldn’t be worth the paper it was printed on because at its heart the agreement was discriminatory? It is an all too common occurrence to find those in power demanding compliance before doing business. There are prenuptial agreements and non-compete clause’s all designed to extract agreement beyond the normal bounds of a contract. Most of these clauses vaporize when exposed to the light of reason from a court of law.

244 posted on 05/17/2002 8:43:25 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
That's what's so dangerous about the entire field. It gives you money like you never dreamed, but it rots your soul unless you are one of the few who really enjoys the work, and want to do it forever. Silvas claims she's not proud of the job, but she would rather continue in it for the money. Well, when is she ever not going to need money? She's all but admitted she's going to quit -- but when will she if not when people offered help?

That is very true. Mom's not teaching her daughter a very good lesson if she hates and is ashamed of the job, yet continues to do it only for the money. One thing I am (and maybe wrongly) assuming here is that the daughter doesn't know the majority of these things, because she is a 5 year old child. That said, if the mom has no problem morally with stripping, and if it's not hurting the child, then no one else has the right to make her quit it because THEY find it morally wrong. No one has the right to impose their morals and/or values on anyone else, unless it is personally harming them or their family.

I would hope that the mom is investing that stripping money (after expenses are taken out of it), or finding a way to better herself and their situation with it. I have no respect for a woman that is stripping, hates it, and isn't making plans or preparing to better her situation. That is just stupid.
245 posted on 05/17/2002 8:43:54 AM PDT by KimaraChan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Then again, it is your soul that is the important part, right?

Right. I admire beautiful women. Part of the reason I admire them is because instinctively I am considering what it might be like to have sex with them---I am a human male, and that is biology.

I am not, however, an adulterer. As I wrote before, I know what adultery is, I know what it takes to be one, and I'd cut off my nads before I ever considered committing adultery.

Is it possible that somehow, something was lost along the way in this particular translation? Esp. with the word "lust"? Maybe in Christ's time the Aramaic word for molestation was similiar to the Greek word describing "lust," and something was lost along the way to King James' Merrie Olde England.


246 posted on 05/17/2002 8:45:27 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
I would argue that stripping is self abuse of the temple of the Christian body that God requires his followers to maintain holy.
247 posted on 05/17/2002 8:46:29 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Point taken. I will concede that many, if not most, of them start into it with the best of intentions. But once they get started, it's easy to get caught up in the lifestyle, then it become increasingly difficult to leave.

I'd like to know how many actually get in and get out quickly. Probably not very many.

No one ever intends to become a drug addict when they first start using drugs and just like the show I saw about the lifestyle of prostitutes...they ALL said that when they started it would just be "temporary"...to get them out of a "jam". 10, 20 yrs later, they're still at it.

248 posted on 05/17/2002 8:47:22 AM PDT by GuillermoX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I don't know about that! There seems to be some freepers that would like to be a support. And then tell their wife and children they were not doing anything wrong! With the "it's legal" line.
249 posted on 05/17/2002 8:47:27 AM PDT by sausageseller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
I would counter that stripping is displaying the temple of one's body so others can appreciate and revel in the greater glory that is God.
250 posted on 05/17/2002 8:48:08 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: valkyrieanne
The bottom line is that this has always been a touchy subject with God. God uses simple things that we can understand to help us with larger issues. 'A man will leave his father and mother, cleave to his wife and the two will become one flesh'. God is a jealous God. He was married to his people. When the Israelites went after other gods- that was adultery in his eyes- they played the harlot. Idolatry and adultery have always been synonymous in the Bible. When the house of Israel was judged by God and taken away by the Assyrian empire it was because of their idolatry/adultery. The same went for Judah when their time came. The relationship between Jesus and his church is the same as the relationship between a husband and wife. Jesus said that anyone who looks apon a woman with lust has commited adultery in his heart. This is pounded into our heads over and over in the Bible. Obviously those who try to justify the mother's position from a Christian perspective haven't read the Bible much.
251 posted on 05/17/2002 8:48:37 AM PDT by the-ironically-named-proverbs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: KimaraChan
That said, if the mom has no problem morally with stripping, and if it's not hurting the child, then no one else has the right to make her quit it because THEY find it morally wrong.

And no one has made her quit, have they? At the same time, she is not entitled to a spot in a Christian school for her daughter. The Christian school is within its rights to reserve space in its classroom for children whose parents are serious about their professed faith.

Like I said, a decision was made by this mother. She made it. Going to the press is not a rational next step.

SD

252 posted on 05/17/2002 8:49:19 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
For the sexual gratification of married men?
253 posted on 05/17/2002 8:49:24 AM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
And no one has made her quit, have they? At the same time, she is not entitled to a spot in a Christian school for her daughter. The Christian school is within its rights to reserve space in its classroom for children whose parents are serious about their professed faith.

Like I said, a decision was made by this mother. She made it. Going to the press is not a rational next step


Point taken, and I agree. ^_^
254 posted on 05/17/2002 8:51:11 AM PDT by KimaraChan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
In the if my aunt had balls category…

right back at 'cha

What if the school was being duplicitous when it crafted the agreement knowing all the while if it ever got to a court of law the agreement wouldn’t be worth the paper it was printed on because at its heart the agreement was discriminatory?

then why did she sign it?

bottom line: it's a private school....she signed the agreement under her own volition. If you want to do what you want to do where nobody cares..then you stick your kid in a public school.

255 posted on 05/17/2002 8:51:43 AM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
On a serious note the Bible talks about being forgiven for 'four score and 20 sins' so this stripper mom is deserving of forgiveness many more times over (80+)

Innaccurate quote and misunderstnding of the section. IOW, your assertion is wrong.

The woman has not repented, nor has she sought forgiveness, nor has she shown an inclination to change her attitude or her ways.

If thy brother sin against thee, REBUKE him AND IF HE REPENT, forgive him.

256 posted on 05/17/2002 8:51:55 AM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: TheCPA
The daughter has done nothing wrong and should not be expelled from school. Ezekiel 18:20 "The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son"
Exactly. Some people would rather take any opportunity to be moralistic prigs than follow either the principles of their declared faith or common sense.

Would they expel the child of a criminal? I doubt it.

-Eric

257 posted on 05/17/2002 8:52:10 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Guns4va
Want to bet that the Pastor's offer of "help" included issueing her kneepads? What a slimeball.

You don't know this man. This comment was completely uncalled for.

258 posted on 05/17/2002 8:52:56 AM PDT by BornOnTheFourth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: KimaraChan
Maybe since her job allows her to stay at home all week, she should consider home education

Yea, she could put a pole in the front yard and teach her child and and all the neighborhooh girls how to " work it"! {sarcasm off}

259 posted on 05/17/2002 8:53:19 AM PDT by sausageseller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
The gratification does not have to be actively sexual in nature. Men---married or un---can appreciate the beauty of the female temple without simian knee-jerk activities or behavior. Yes.
260 posted on 05/17/2002 8:53:30 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-460 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson