Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quila
At least you could use "pro-choice" when referring to the other side. It shows honest intent at discourse rather than name calling.

Oh, did I hurt your feelings? The term "pro-choice" is a deceptive term - what exactly is being chosen, and who is it that is choosing?
Infanticide is the killing of babies, and according to any honest biologist or geneticist a human "fetus" can only BE a human being.
You can use any feel-good term you want, it doesn't change the fact of what an abotion does: it kills a baby human being.
To believe other-wise is strictly denial.

5 posted on 05/17/2002 7:58:48 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Psalm 73
The term "pro-choice" is a deceptive term - what exactly is being chosen, and who is it that is choosing?

And "pro-life" is deceptive according to some quite logical arguments too. Look, I'm not for abortion. I have two daughters, one on the way, and hoping that one won't end in miscarriage like three others did. Do you think I could possibly consider an abortion? (okay, maybe that was way too much info, but I think you get the point)

11 posted on 05/18/2002 10:45:27 AM PDT by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson