Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quila
At least you could use "pro-choice" when referring to the other side.

People who run abortion clinics are not "pro-choice". They make buckets of money off putting dead babies in buckets, and they are no more "pro-choice" about a woman deciding whether or not to abort than GM is "pro-choice" about your decision whether or not to buy a Chevy, or Microsoft is "pro-choice" about your decision to upgrade Office. In all cases, they are "pro" a particular "choice," and only that choice.

That is why, as posted here a few days ago, barely 1% of Planned Parenthood's clients choose adoption.

8 posted on 05/17/2002 1:32:28 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Campion
People who run abortion clinics are not "pro-choice".

I thought you were talking about people's views in general, not those actually performing the abortions. I'll admit that any time money gets into the mix and something becomes a for-profit industry, people get greedy and things go bad.

9 posted on 05/18/2002 10:30:37 AM PDT by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson