Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alloysteel
Most ethanol is made by cooking corn with natural gas. Nat. gas is a high rank fuel and could be used as a motor fuel. So, why go to the trouble of raising government-subsidized corn ?
3 posted on 05/17/2002 8:02:10 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
Votes. Or more exactly, political contributions from ADM to buy votes.
4 posted on 05/17/2002 8:04:34 AM PDT by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Most ethanol is made by cooking corn with natural gas. Nat. gas is a high rank fuel and could be used as a motor fuel.

Not to mention petroleum-based fertilizers and pesticides.

Not a very energy-efficient conversion process.

Besides, I can think of a better use for corn liquor than burning in an engine.

5 posted on 05/17/2002 8:07:36 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Ethanol production consumes more "fossil fuels" than burning the fossil fuels for energy directly. As a result it actually exacerbates the energy problem. If ethanol were to take off, I'll bet Washington would start paying farmers *not* to produce it in order to conserve the fossil fuel supply.
6 posted on 05/17/2002 8:11:19 AM PDT by Deathmonger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson