Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

U.S. botched chances to capture bin Laden
By Mansoor Ijaz
The Deseret News (Salt Lake City, UT)
VIEWPOINT; Pg. AA09
December 9, 2001, Sunday
President Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates, including one as late as last year.

I know because I negotiated more than one of the opportunities. From 1996 to 1998, I opened unofficial channels between Sudan and the Clinton administration. I met with officials in both countries, including Clinton, U.S. National Security Adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger and Sudan's president and intelligence chief. President Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir, who wanted terrorism sanctions against Sudan lifted, offered the arrest and extradition of bin Laden and detailed intelligence data about the global networks constructed by Egypt's Islamic Jihad, Iran's Hezbollah and the Palestinian Hamas.

Among those in the networks were the two hijackers who piloted commercial airliners into the World Trade Center.

The silence of the Clinton administration in responding to these offers was deafening.

As an American Muslim and a political supporter of Clinton, I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then, that their counterterrorism policies fueled the rise of bin Laden from an ordinary man to a Hydra-like monster.

Realizing the growing problem with bin Laden, Bashir sent key intelligence officials to the United States in February 1996.

The Sudanese offered to arrest bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia or, barring that, to "baby-sit" him -- monitoring all his activities and associates.

But Saudi officials didn't want their home-grown terrorist back where he might plot to overthrow them.

In May 1996, the Sudanese capitulated to U.S. pressure and asked bin Laden to leave, despite their feeling that he could be monitored better in Sudan than elsewhere.

Bin Laden left for Afghanistan, taking with him Ayman Zawahiri, considered by the United States to be the chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks; Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, who traveled frequently to Germany to obtain electronic equipment for al-Qaida; Wadih El-Hage, bin Laden's personal secretary and roving emissary, now serving a life sentence in the United States for his role in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya; and Fazul Abdullah Mohammed and Saif Adel, also accused of carrying out the embassy attacks. Some of these men are now among the FBI's 22 most-wanted terrorists.

The two men who allegedly piloted the planes into the twin towers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi, prayed in the same Hamburg, Germany, mosque as did Salim and Mamoun Darkazanli, a Syrian trader who managed Salim's bank accounts and whose assets are frozen.

Important data on each had been compiled by the Sudanese.

But U.S. authorities repeatedly turned the data away, first in February 1996; then again that August, when at my suggestion Sudan's religious ideologue, Hassan Turabi, wrote directly to Clinton; then again in April 1997, when I persuaded Bashir to invite the FBI to come to Sudan and view the data; and finally in February 1998, when Sudan's intelligence chief, Gutbi al-Mahdi, wrote directly to the FBI.

Gutbi had shown me some of Sudan's data during a three-hour meeting in Khartoum in October 1996. When I returned to Washington, I told Berger and his specialist for East Africa, Susan Rice, about the data available. They said they'd get back to me. They never did. Neither did they respond when Bashir made the offer directly. I believe they never had any intention to engage Muslim countries -- ally or not. Radical Islam, for the administration, was a convenient national security threat. And that was not the end of it. In July 2000 -- three months before the deadly attack on the destroyer Cole in Yemen -- I brought the White House another plausible offer to deal with bin Laden, by then known to be involved in the embassy bombings.

A senior counterterrorism official from one of the United States' closest Arab allies -- an ally whose name I am not free to divulge -- approached me with the proposal after telling me he was fed up with the antics and arrogance of U.S. counterterrorism officials.

The offer, which would have brought bin Laden to the Arab country as the first step of an extradition process that would eventually deliver him to the United States, required only that Clinton make a state visit there to personally request bin Laden's extradition. But senior Clinton officials sabotaged the offer, letting it get caught up in internal politics within the ruling family -- Clintonian diplomacy at its best.

Clinton's failure to grasp the opportunity to unravel increasingly organized extremists, coupled with Berger's assessments of their potential to directly threaten the United States, represents one of the most serious foreign policy failures in American history.


1 posted on 05/17/2002 10:03:52 PM PDT by Wallaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Wallaby
Hannity and Colmes
2 posted on 05/17/2002 10:07:56 PM PDT by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
I've hear Mansoor talk about this before, not realizing he was a political supporter of clinton, which should give this more weight as if it needed it. Mansoor is very knowledgable and good to listen to.
3 posted on 05/17/2002 10:30:26 PM PDT by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby, dirt
Very good find, as usual.

(just checked your sign on date... you're older than dirt!)

5 posted on 05/18/2002 12:02:40 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
The Clinton administration failed to deal with Bin Laden .

The Bush administration failed to deal with Bin Laden early enough.

There is guilt enough for everyone.

The survivors of the murdered Americans will watch closely and sue each side.

More power to them!

6 posted on 05/18/2002 12:25:33 AM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; JohnHuang2
Wow, Mansoor Ijaz made it onto CNBC with this info? I thought only FoxNews was giving him air time. Perhaps there's hope?
7 posted on 05/18/2002 12:28:31 AM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
Many Thanks for the post.
10 posted on 05/18/2002 12:33:43 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby;JohnHuang2
They have to understand that, whether we like it or not--I could even be picked up. And if I was picked up and put in a jail somewhere, I'd sit there as long as it took to go through the due process, because the time has come for us to be Americans first.

Bump and good morning to you too.

11 posted on 05/18/2002 12:44:12 AM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
Any chance of Manzoor Ijaz getting on CNN? I want to see him and the congress-critters "discuss" the issues, seems that not enough of the public will hear from him otherwise.
26 posted on 05/18/2002 8:17:18 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
WHAT AND WHEN

by Tarzana Joe

THE MOST URGENT QUESTION THAT’S PLAGUING THIS POET IS "WHAT DID HE KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?" FOR THE PUNDITS ALL TELL US THE ENTIRE STORY HANGS ON THIS ONE INTEROGATORY.

WHEN DID HE KNOW (OH IT GIVES ME A SHIVER) THAT THE TAX CUT HE PROMISED HE’D NEVER DELIVER? AND DID HE KNOW THEN (THIS COULD LAND HIM IN JAIL) THAT HIS PARTNER DESIGNED A PLAN THAT WOULD FAIL? AND COULD HE HAVE KNOWN (I’M SO MAD I EXPECTORATE) THAT IT’S WRONG TO DECEIVE THE ENTIRE ELECTORATE? OH DID HE KNOW THEN (AND DOES HE KNOW NOW ) THAT IT’S WRONG TO TAKE CASH FROM A DONOR NAMED MAO? DID HE KNOW (AS WE LEARNED IN A LENGTHY REPORT) DID HE KNOW IT WAS WRONG TO TELL LIES TO A COURT? OH, SORRY (IT SEEMS THAT I GOT THE WRONG PRESIDENT) I WAS THINKING ABOUT THE PREVIOUS RESIDENT. THAT FELLOW WHO’S FRIENDS ARE NOW CARPING AND CROWING WHO SPEAK WITH AUDACITY BEYOND HUMAN KNOWING WHO SUGGEST WITH A WINK AND IMPLY WITH A WORD A CONCLUSION THEY SURELY MUST KNOW IS ABSURD. I’VE KNOW ALL ALONG AND THIS IS A FACT AND I SAY IT WITHOUT ANY MANNERS OR TACT YES, I SWEAR BY THE OWNER WHO CAN NOT BE NAMED SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST TOO LOW TO BE SHAMED.
Tarzanajoe@hotmail.com

27 posted on 05/18/2002 8:23:00 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
BTTT
29 posted on 05/18/2002 8:32:12 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
...because when I brought them (clinton) an opportunity to act, they didn't do anything.

bump

36 posted on 05/18/2002 1:46:24 PM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby; Askel5; Boyd; dirtboy; robbinsj
I feel now, as I argued with Clinton and Berger then

Methinks he was barkin' up the wrong tree.

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/4438.html

.... The oil cooperation between China and Sudan began in 1995, which included cooperation under the economic aid by the Chinese government and mutually beneficial cooperation both undertaken by China Oil and Gas (Group) Corporation. The oil cooperation projects are progressing smoothly at present. They were completed and began to produce oil at the end of June 1999. The Khartoum, Oil Refinery jointly built by China and Sudan was completed and went into operation in May, 2000......

No wonder klintoon's fully politicized FBI went after Trafficante

CALLING FOR RESIGNATION OF SANDY BERGER
May 25, 1999

Mr. Speaker, the fact is Sandy Berger is our national security advisor. The fact is Sandy Berger was once China's chief lobbyist in America. The fact is now there is a hole in our national security so big we could throw Berger and all our secrets all the way to China nonstop. Beam me up.

I am not accusing Sandy Berger of any wrongdoing. But for the good of America, Sandy Berger should resign as our national security advisor. Sandy Berger is very close to China. In Washington, perception becomes reality.

Mr. Speaker, I yield back any secrets we have left.

40 posted on 05/18/2002 6:47:38 PM PDT by Hamiltonian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wallaby
He was on Imus this morning. He said the clinton machine has been trying for 7 months to get him to shut up. Imus told him we don't want to find my in a park lying by a cannon. (for those of you in Rio Linda, that is a reference to clinton's lawyer, Vince Foster, who ended up Arkancided in Ft. Marcy Park).
44 posted on 06/05/2002 9:35:16 AM PDT by Samizdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

.
45 posted on 03/24/2004 5:26:30 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson