[hobbes1]

Get a grip. Forcing the Mother to give up gainful employment to prevent her daughters suspension reeks of the same stiff necked arrogance, that led the headmaster to strip the valedictoryu privlege for a haircut deemed ...Too Short.

Had they simply refused her back, next year, this would be a non issue.

[AppyPappy]

She doesn't have to give up gainful employment. She has to quit stripping if she wants her child to attend a Christian school. She can work at almost any job.

[sausageseller]

Forcing the Mother to give up gainful employment

SS. The school is not forcing her to do anything other than trying to get her to live up to the agreement she signed!

She knew her stripping would not be approved of.

She chose to do it "incognito".

She chose to put her childs education in jeopardy.

And her being a former sunday school teacher at the church that has the school, she knew her actions would conflict with this agreement!

[sayfer bullets]

Had they simply refused her back, next year, this would be a non issue.

This would have been a reasonable treatment of the situation, with 3 weeks left in the girl's classes. The mother would have had months to consider her future.

Why give the press ammunition?

[let freedom sing]

Had they simply refused her back, next year, this would be a non issue.

Stripper-Mom would make it an issue next year, too-- this was just a matter of time and attention. Why is a story like this, national news? The liberal press flies into action with sinsational tabloid reports. No one had their civil rights violated and no one broke the criminal laws-- as far as we know.