[jgrubbs]

Parents Exposing Kids On Soft-Porn Web Sites

[Phantom Lord]

without a purpose of marketing a product or service

Offer widgets for sale and you are in compliance with the law.

[El Sordo]

While I'm for the idea, the way this law is written seems rather open-ended and easy to abuse, and does not seem difficult to circumvent.

[codebreaker]

Here comes the ACLU-Libertarian faction..batten down the hatches!

[OBAFGKM]

Wouldn't this criminalize the children's pageant circuit?

[gdani]

What an idiot law. I love how people always think there should be new exceptions to the First Amendment.

If the people supporting this law are serious in their contentions then why shouldn't all the Sunday newspaper ads featuring girls in training bras and underwear be outlawed? Or the Sears catalog? Or websites that feature juvenile cheerleaders? Can't pedophiles use those to whet their appetite?

[eno_]

Before we decide if this is good or bad, would anyone care to step up and offer a case for the constitutionality of this being a federal law?

[pragmatic]

Can't they charge the parents with corruption of a minor, or such? That seems like a pretty quick way to end these sites.