[jgrubbs]

If you actually read the law you would see that it doesn't affect "Sunday newspaper ads or the Sears catalog". It is targeting the Adult industry who is using little girls in provocative and erotic poses to charge memberships to their Web site. These are pornographers who are profiting from pedophiles.

If that is what you support, that is your choice, just don't choose it anywhere near me, I'm also support the NRA.

[gdani]

If you actually read the law you would see that it doesn't affect "Sunday newspaper ads or the Sears catalog". It is targeting the Adult industry who is using little girls in provocative and erotic poses to charge memberships to their Web site.

Uh, perhaps you (obviously) didn't get my point. The point is that there are any number of things that pedophiles can use to be turned on. It makes no sense to outlaw, say, child model websites when someone can still pick up a Target circular and see an 11-year-old in a training bra or watch the Olson twins run around in bikinis in some movie.

Not to mention that the law will/would be quickly struck down on First Amendment grounds - as if that's ever stopped Congress from pasing stupid laws before.