Posted on 05/22/2002 12:05:34 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Law-enforcement officers on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco demanded that a pair of college students walking across the structure as part of a demonstration remove their pro-life T-shirts or be subject to a fine and jail time.
"Our walkers' free-speech rights have been stifled by the bridge patrol," said Adam Redmon, director of Crossroads, a division of American Life League, the organization sponsoring the walk. "Officers ordered our team members – who were wearing pro-life T-shirts – to remove their shirts. America is pro-life, and pro-life Americans should not be targeted for discrimination – especially in the San Francisco Bay area, where the right to free expression is held in high regard."
Crossroads' annual walk, in which pro-life students walk across the country, began on Monday. According to the organization, the participants "pray at abortion facilities, speak at churches and host town hall meetings to educate the public about abortion."
Leaving San Francisco and heading to Toronto on Monday, the walkers approached the Golden Gate Bridge. As they crossed, officers from the Golden Gate District stopped them and told them their shirts were not allowed on the bridge. On the front, the T-shirts read "Pro-Life." An American flag is featured on the back.
According to Crossroads, the walkers were informed that the pro-life shirts are a form of political protest and that if they didn't remove the clothing, they could be punished with a $10,000 fine and a year in jail.
Redmon told WorldNetDaily that the officers told the students their walking was a distraction to traffic on the bridge. But to communicate their demand to the walkers, he said, the policemen "had to stop traffic."
"The officers were very insistent" about the need to remove the shirts, Redmon said.
The two students who were stopped complied with the officers' demand to remove their shirts. Three others were faster walkers and thus reached the opposite side without being stopped. Redmon was unsure what other clothing the students had available besides the T-shirts.
Kary Witt, bridge manager of the Golden Gate District, has apologized for the incident.
"It should not have happened," he told WND. "One officer got way overzealous."
Witt said a representative from the San Francisco Catholic Diocese contacted him to complain and that he offered the district's apology.
"I have briefed all our officers on it," he said, to ensure that a similar incident doesn't happen again.
Witt says the same college students were on the bridge on Saturday and unfurled a banner, which is prohibited without a permit. One of the officers was aware of the action on Saturday and, said Witt, "feared they were going to unfurl the banner again."
The students carried a three-foot statue of Mary with them, but it was the shirts that the officers objected to.
According to Redmon, there have been over 25 cases this year alone where public high-school students have been told not to wear pro-life shirts to school.
"This is a disturbing trend," Redmon said. "We have contacted our lawyers about the incident on the Golden Gate Bridge. We want to right this wrong before others are subjected to the discriminatory whim of the bridge patrol."
Witt hoped to contact Crossroads to head off any legal action against his agency.
I hope the plaintiffs own the bridge at the end of this one.
Now if the men put on dresses and high heels there would be no problem.
I heard that since they're not going to be able to have signs, they going to be wearing t-shirts, probably saying, "Stop the War" and of course, sumthin' about "Paleswine."
It'll be interesting to see what happens (if anything) to them.
Stay t-uned! : )
(Hey, you know, when I went to get my freerepublic.com cap, there was a guy there and he was getting a cap that said, "Shithead." (Whatever...) Butt, I wonder what they would do if he were on the Bridge?
Would've been cool if they were women. "Now what are you going to do, arrest me for public indecency? You told me to take the shirt off!"
"No. I am NOT going to take this shirt off. You go right ahead and arrest me. And when the charges are dropped, which they will, I am going to sue you for false arrest and unlawful detainment."
And I would back it up, too. You want to see a stupid cop crap his pants?
My opinion would be, in school the issue would get tied up with the school's in loco parentis status during school hours. But these cops have no such status, and since their actions are clearly in violation of the first amendment according to tons of precedent, they're clearly acting outside their jurisdiction, therefore as common citizens.
I'd be willing to modify my opinion in the face of the opinions of any pro lawyers out here, but this is the conclusion I come to from my reading of law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.