Skip to comments.
Pro-lifers censored in San Francisco
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Wednesday, May 22, 2002
| By Ron Strom
Posted on 05/22/2002 12:05:34 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Good. Now they know they are at war!
2
posted on
05/22/2002 12:08:18 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: JohnHuang2
That does it! I'm wearing pro-life underwear. Go ahead, copper, make me take it off!
To: JohnHuang2
I hope Bill O'Reilly gets a hold of this one. It would be very nice to get this publicized, especially on the heels of the SF fat chick's new career as a fitness role model. The liberal lunacy has peaked.
To: JohnHuang2
I'm not keen on frivolous lawsuits but this bridge patrol is begging to be sued into oblivion. An Idiot of the New Millennium nomination is in order for this patrolman.
I hope the plaintiffs own the bridge at the end of this one.
5
posted on
05/22/2002 12:35:23 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
To: JohnHuang2
the walkers were informed that the pro-life shirts are a form of political protest Now if the men put on dresses and high heels there would be no problem.
6
posted on
05/22/2002 12:37:48 AM PDT
by
pariah
To: CounterCounterCulture
That does it! I'm wearing pro-life underwear. Go ahead, copper, make me take it off!
On second thought, the LAST thing I want to be is naked in Sin Freaksicko. Disregard initial post.
To: CounterCounterCulture; JohnHuang2; TheAngryClam; mac_truck; Drango
Hey CCC, wanna try that remark Saturday? ; )
takeittothebridge.org
sf.indymedia.org
I heard that since they're not going to be able to have signs, they going to be wearing t-shirts, probably saying, "Stop the War" and of course, sumthin' about "Paleswine."
It'll be interesting to see what happens (if anything) to them.
"I left my heart t-shirt in San Francisco."
To: American Preservative
I was wonderin' the same thing. Double-standards in the City by the Bay? Nawwwwwwwww...
To: CounterCounterCulture
No shi*t! : ) (A censured t-shi
rt.) : )
Stay t-uned! : )
(Hey, you know, when I went to get my freerepublic.com cap, there was a guy there and he was getting a cap that said, "Shithead." (Whatever...) Butt, I wonder what they would do if he were on the Bridge?
To: JohnHuang2
The two students who were stopped complied with the officers' demand to remove their shirts. Would've been cool if they were women. "Now what are you going to do, arrest me for public indecency? You told me to take the shirt off!"
11
posted on
05/22/2002 4:26:31 AM PDT
by
Quila
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnHuang2
Have no fear the ACLU will be all over them any second now.........waiting.........waiting....
13
posted on
05/22/2002 4:55:27 AM PDT
by
gilor
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnHuang2
This is a joke right? Or just when did San Francisco leave the union? Are they now officialy a separate country using the Cuban model?
15
posted on
05/22/2002 6:21:45 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: JohnHuang2
Bump
16
posted on
05/22/2002 6:32:15 AM PDT
by
EdReform
To: JohnHuang2
Refuse to remove the shirts and be arrested. Then file a common law action in tresspass (easy to do even for a non-lawyer) and take their houses and pensions. That would stop this crap forthwith.
To: RobbyS
I'll tell you what, though, I am disappointed with the guys wearing the shirts. I would not have removed them. I would have handled it this way:
"No. I am NOT going to take this shirt off. You go right ahead and arrest me. And when the charges are dropped, which they will, I am going to sue you for false arrest and unlawful detainment."
And I would back it up, too. You want to see a stupid cop crap his pants?
18
posted on
05/22/2002 7:06:05 AM PDT
by
Houmatt
To: William Terrell
Could students who wear pro-life t-shirts to a public school file a "common law action in tresspass" if the school's administrators force the students to remove their t-shirts? Taking houses and pensions from public school officials who pull this crap is appealing!
19
posted on
05/22/2002 7:12:14 AM PDT
by
EdReform
To: EdReform
Could students who wear pro-life t-shirts to a public school file a "common law action in tresspass" if the school's administrators force the students to remove their t-shirts? My opinion would be, in school the issue would get tied up with the school's in loco parentis status during school hours. But these cops have no such status, and since their actions are clearly in violation of the first amendment according to tons of precedent, they're clearly acting outside their jurisdiction, therefore as common citizens.
I'd be willing to modify my opinion in the face of the opinions of any pro lawyers out here, but this is the conclusion I come to from my reading of law.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson