Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wanted to find the whole story here, and I think this is it.

H.R.4757
Sponsor: Rep McCarthy, Carolyn(introduced 5/16/2002)
Latest Major Action: 5/16/2002 Referred to House committee. Latest Status: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Title: To improve the national instant criminal background check system, and for other purposes.

Rep Andrews, Robert E. - 5/16/2002 Rep Blagojevich, Rod R. - 5/16/2002
Rep Brown, Corrine - 5/16/2002 Rep Capuano, Michael E. - 5/16/2002
Rep Carson, Julia - 5/16/2002 Rep Castle, Michael N. - 5/16/2002
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 5/16/2002 Rep Conyers, John, Jr. - 5/16/2002
Rep Davis, Danny K. - 5/16/2002 Rep DeGette, Diana - 5/24/2002
Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. - 5/16/2002 Rep Dingell, John D. - 5/16/2002
Rep Engel, Eliot L. - 5/16/2002 Rep Ford, Harold, Jr. - 5/16/2002
Rep Frank, Barney - 5/16/2002 Rep Gilman, Benjamin A. - 5/16/2002
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. - 5/22/2002 Rep Hastings, Alcee L. - 5/16/2002
Rep Hoeffel, Joseph M. - 5/16/2002 Rep Israel, Steve - 5/16/2002
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila - 5/16/2002 Rep Kirk, Mark Steven - 5/16/2002
Rep Langevin, James R. - 5/16/2002 Rep Lofgren, Zoe - 5/16/2002
Rep Lowey, Nita M. - 5/16/2002 Rep McGovern, James P. - 5/16/2002
Rep Meehan, Martin T. - 5/16/2002 Rep Moore, Dennis - 5/16/2002
Rep Moran, James P. - 5/16/2002 Rep Morella, Constance A. - 5/16/2002
Rep Nadler, Jerrold - 5/16/2002 Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes - 5/16/2002
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. - 5/16/2002 Rep Rivers, Lynn N. - 5/16/2002
Rep Rothman, Steve R. - 5/16/2002 Rep Roukema, Marge - 5/16/2002
Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille - 5/16/2002 Rep Rush, Bobby L. - 5/16/2002
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 5/16/2002 Rep Sherman, Brad - 5/16/2002
Rep Tauscher, Ellen O. - 5/16/2002 Rep Towns, Edolphus - 5/16/2002
Rep Waters, Maxine - 5/16/2002 Rep Waxman, Henry A. - 5/16/2002
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. - 5/16/2002 Rep Wexler, Robert - 5/16/2002
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 5/16/2002

107th CONGRESS

2d Session
H. R. 4757
To improve the national instant criminal background check system, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 16, 2002
Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. KIRK, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. GILMAN, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. ANDREWS, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. FRANK, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MOORE, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. NADLER, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. HOEFFEL, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. FORD, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. WEINER, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. WATERS, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. RUSH, Mr. CLAY, Mr. ROTHMAN, Ms. DELAURO, and Mr. SHERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL
To improve the national instant criminal background check system, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Our Lady of Peace Act'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

The Congress finds the following:

(1) Since 1994, more than 689,000 individuals have been denied a gun for failing a background check.
(2) States that fail to computerize their criminal and mental illness records are the primary cause of delays for background checks. Helping States automate their records will reduce delays for law-abiding gun owners.
(3) 25 States have automated less than 60 percent of their felony criminal conviction records.
(4) 33 States do not automate or share disqualifying mental health records.
(5) In 13 States, domestic violence restraining orders are not automated or accessible by the national instant criminal background check system.
(6) In 15 States, no domestic violence misdemeanor records are automated or accessible by the national instant criminal background check system.
TITLE I--TRANSMITTAL OF RECORDS

SEC. 101. ENHANCEMENT OF REQUIREMENT THAT FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES PROVIDE RELEVANT INFORMATION TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 103(e)(1) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 922 note) is amended--
(1) by striking `may' and inserting `shall, not less frequently than quarterly,';
(2) by inserting `electronically' before `furnish'; and
(3) by adding at the end the following: `The head of each such department or agency shall ascertain whether the department or agency has any records on any person described in any paragraph of section 922(g), title 18, United States Code, and on being made aware that the department or agency of such a record, shall transmit a copy of the record to the Attorney General for inclusion in the system. The Attorney General shall notify the Congress on a quarterly basis as to whether the Attorney General has obtained from each such department or agency the information required to be provided to the Attorney General under this subsection.'.
(b) IMMIGRATION RECORDS- The Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service shall immediately transmit all relevant records of persons disqualified from acquiring a firearm under Federal law, including but not limited to, illegal aliens, visitors to the United States on student visas, and visitors to the United States on tourist visas, to the Attorney General for inclusion in the national instant criminal background check system.

SEC. 102. TRANSMITTAL OF STATE RECORDS TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

(a) IN GENERAL- A State that does not meet the requirements of this section shall be subject to section 104.

(b) REQUIREMENTS- The requirements of this section are as follows:

(1) The State shall provide the name of and other relevant identifying information relating to persons disqualified from acquiring a firearm under Federal or State law to the Attorney General for inclusion in the national instant criminal background check system.

(2) Any information provided to the Attorney General under paragraph (1) may be accessed only by personnel legally entitled to access such system.

(3) The State shall certify to the Attorney General that at least 95 percent of all information under paragraph (1) has been provided to the Attorney General under paragraph (1).

SEC. 103. TRANSMITTAL OF STATE MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM.

(a) IN GENERAL- A State that does not meet the requirement of this section shall be subject to section 104.

(b) REQUIREMENT- The requirement of this section is that the State shall provide the name of and other relevant identifying information relating to persons adjudicated as mental defective or those committed to mental institutions to the Attorney General for inclusion in the national instant criminal background check system.

(c) DEFINITION- For purposes of subsection (b), an adjudication as a mental defective occurs when a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority determines that an individual is mentally retarded or of marked subnormal intelligence, mentally ill, or mentally incompetent, including--

(1) defendants in criminal cases adjudicated as not guilty by reason of insanity, or found incompetent to stand trial;

(2) individuals found to be a danger to others as a result of a mental disorder or illness;

(3) individuals involuntarily committed to a mental institution by a court, board, commission, or other authority;

(4) individuals committed for reasons other than mental defectiveness or mental illness; and

(5) individuals committed within the past 5 years to a mental institution--

(A) for treatment of alcoholism; or

(B) as an unlawful user of, or person addicted to, any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act), provided that such unlawful use has occurred recently enough to indicate that the individual is actively engaged in such conduct.

(d) EXCEPTION- This section does not apply to--

(1) a person--

(A) in a mental institution for observation; or

(B) voluntarily committed to a mental institution; or

(2) information protected by doctor-patient privilege.

(e) PRIVACY PROTECTIONS- The Attorney General shall work with State and local law enforcement and the mental health community to establish protocols for protecting the privacy of information provided in this section. Such protocols shall be in addition to any other applicable laws for protecting the privacy of such information.

(e) COMMENCEMENT OF TRANSMITTAL- Notwithstanding subsection (c), the State shall begin to comply with subsection (b) not later than January 1, 2005. If such compliance occurs before the establishment of protocols under subsection (c), the Attorney General shall ensure that any information provided under this section may be accessed only by personnel authorized by law to access the national instant criminal background check system.

SEC. 104. PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE.

(a) ATTORNEY GENERAL REPORT- Not later than January 31 of each year, the Attorney General shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on the progress of States in automating the databases containing information under sections 102 and 103 and in providing that information pursuant to the requirements of sections 102 and 103.

(b) PENALTIES-

(1) AFTER THREE YEARS- During the period beginning three years after the date of the enactment of this Act and ending five years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General may (but need not), for any State that fails to provide under sections 102 and 103 at least 60 percent of the information required to be provided under those sections, decline to allocate to that State up to 5 percent of the amounts that would otherwise be allocated to that State under section 506 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3756).

(2) AFTER FIVE YEARS- After the expiration of the period referred to in paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall, for any State that fails to provide under sections 102 and 103 at least 95 percent of the information required to be provided under those sections, decline to allocate to that State 10 percent of the amounts that would otherwise be allocated to that State under section 506 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3765).

(3) WAIVER BY ATTORNEY GENERAL- The Attorney General may waive the applicability of paragraph (2) to a State if that State provides compelling evidence of its inability to meet the requirements of sections 102 and 103.

(c) REALLOCATION- Any funds that are not allocated for failure to comply with the requirements of subsection (b) shall be reallocated to States that meet such requirements.

SEC. 105. IMPLEMENTATION GRANTS TO STATES.

(a) IN GENERAL- From amounts made available to carry out this section, the Attorney General shall make grants to each State, in a manner consistent with the national criminal history improvement program, which shall be used by the State, in conjunction with units of local government and State and local courts, to establish or upgrade information and identification technologies for firearms eligibility determinations.

(b) USE OF GRANT AMOUNTS- Grants under this section may only be awarded for the following purposes:

(1) Building databases that are directly related to checks under the national instant criminal background check system (NICS), including court disposition and corrections records.

(2) Assisting States in establishing or enhancing their own capacities to perform NICS background checks.

(3) Improving final dispositions of criminal records.

(4) Supplying mental health records to NICS.

(5) Supplying domestic violence restraining orders and temporary restraining orders for inclusion in NICS.

(c) CONDITION- As a condition of receiving a grant under this section, a State shall specify the projects for which grant amounts will be used, and shall use such amounts only as specified. A State that violates this section shall be liable to the Attorney General for the full amount granted.

(d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $250,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005.

TITLE II--FOCUSING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE ON THE IMPROVEMENT OF RELEVANT RECORDS

SEC. 201. CONTINUING EVALUATIONS.

(a) EVALUATION REQUIRED- The Director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics shall study and evaluate the operations of the national instant criminal background check system. Such study and evaluation shall include, but not be limited to, compilations and analyses of the operations and record systems of the agencies and organizations participating in such system.

(b) REPORT ON GRANTS- Not later than January 31 of each year, the Director shall submit to Congress a report on the implementation of sections 102 and 103 of this Act.

(c) REPORT ON BEST PRACTICES- Not later than January 31 of each year, the Director shall submit to Congress, and to each State participating in the National Criminal History Improvement Program, a report of the practices of the States regarding the collection, maintenance, automation, and transmittal of identifying information relating to individuals described in section 922(g) of title 18, United States Code, by the State or any other agency, or any other records relevant to the national instant criminal background check system, that the Director considers to be best practices.

TITLE III--GRANTS TO STATE COURTS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT IN AUTOMATION AND TRANSMITTAL OF DISPOSITION RECORDS

SEC. 301. GRANTS AUTHORIZED.

(a) IN GENERAL- From amounts made available to carry out this section, the Attorney General shall make grants to each State for use by the chief judicial officer of the State to improve the handling of proceedings related to criminal history dispositions and temporary restraining orders as they relate to disqualification from firearms ownership under State and Federal laws.

(b) USE OF FUNDS- Amounts granted under this section shall be used by the chief judicial officer only as follows:

(1) For fiscal year 2003, such amounts shall be used to carry out assessments of the capabilities of the courts of the State for the automation and transmission to State and Federal record repositories the arrest and conviction records of such courts to the extent relevant to disqualification from firearms ownership under State and Federal laws.

(2) For fiscal years after 2003, such amounts shall be used to implement policies, systems, and procedures for the automation and transmission to State and Federal record repositories the arrest and conviction records of such courts to the extent relevant to disqualification from firearms ownership under State and Federal laws.

(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There are authorized to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry out this section $125,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005.

-------------------------------------

This one isn't that bad, but I'm still opposed to it for different reasons. To me, this is an infringement on STATES RIGHTS.

1 posted on 05/24/2002 9:23:12 AM PDT by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bang_list


2 posted on 05/24/2002 9:26:04 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
1) Under Article 1, Section 8 the Congress does not have the authority to pass this law!

2)Yet more information in federal databases? No way! Enough is enough!

3) I don't trust the federal govt to obey the privacy strictures listed in the bill. Who enforces them? Why no penalties for disobeying?

3 posted on 05/24/2002 9:35:07 AM PDT by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
We have Dingell. Is Norwood on board?
5 posted on 05/24/2002 9:38:40 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
Since 1994, more than 689,000 individuals have been denied a gun for failing a background check.

They like to cite that number quite often, but many (if not most) of those denied are denied because of screw-ups in the computer system, or for having a name similar to a convicted felon.

I see this legislation as one step closer to a national computer database that will eventually include all Americans with KGB-style reports on each of us.

6 posted on 05/24/2002 9:41:23 AM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
I'd like to see Dingell pair this bill with the removal of the 'restraining order' gun ownership ban, since restraining orders are offered by judges for the asking in almost all divorce cases.
39 posted on 05/29/2002 11:41:31 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
Yep, centralizing everything is bad. And the domestic violence crap is a laugher.

Maybe they should come up with a way to track down Arab terrorist instead. Be more helpful wouldn't it?

Or how about spending the money on border security? Looks to me as if this needs looking at.

Anybody for compelling the Federal government to track non-citizen visitor and deport those that overstay there welcome? Might be money better spent since these wackos want to track people.

Dingell is a useful idiot at best.

tarpon

52 posted on 05/29/2002 5:03:07 PM PDT by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson