Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musharraf tells troops to stop cross-border terrorism into J&K: US media
Express India ^ | 25 may 2002

Posted on 05/25/2002 8:30:30 AM PDT by flamefront

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: abwehr
The 'invaluable' assistance to the US consisted primarily of allowing US carrier aircraft to overfly their territory.

That simply isn't true. We have had troops stationed in bases in Pakistan for months now. We've conducted joint operations in the frontier areas, resulting the capture of the highest al-Qaida official, Zubaydeh, so far. They have turned over people to us without going through the extradition process. There's more, but it's pretty clear that your mind is closed on the matter and I'm wasting my time.

21 posted on 05/25/2002 10:11:29 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
One thing about the Pak nukes that really is disturbing is that rather than them being centrally controlled like we are used to in Russia and the U.S., the Pak nukes appear to be only in control of individual warlords.

Say what you want about Pakistan, but the army is very tightly controlled and the discipline there is real. Those nukes are under very tight control, and to our satisfaction. Pakistan is not Somalia with nukes.

22 posted on 05/25/2002 10:14:26 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"I think the chances of an imminent war are quite slim."

All it would take is another large terror attack. The Indians are on a hair trigger. If there are no more terror attacks this summer, then India will likely stand down.

23 posted on 05/25/2002 11:57:53 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: monday
All it would take is another large terror attack.

That may be. Al-Qaida would love nothing more than to start such a war. It could get rid of Musharraf, and help unite the muslim world. It would certainly cause chaos, and that's just what they want.

24 posted on 05/25/2002 12:01:39 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
"Say what you want about Pakistan, but the army is very tightly controlled and the discipline there is real."

Huh? Pakistan is a military dictatorship. The only control over the Military is the Generals who run it.

Even when Pakistan had a civilian government, the president had to ask the CIA to brief her on what Pakistans nuclear capabilities were. Her military would not tell her. Tightly controlled? What a joke.

25 posted on 05/25/2002 12:10:35 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: monday
What did I just get through saying?? The military is very tightly controlled.
26 posted on 05/25/2002 12:57:35 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson