[Paul Ross]

Wrong. The Titan II was always an early hard-target-killer to preclude the Soviet military leadership from thinking they could hide deep enough under mountains to survive the war and yet prevail. Not a city-attack weapon. This kind of warhead would be uneconomic for such an attack. Indeed, MULTIPLE small warheads are vastly more efficient (and far cheaper to make and deliver) for optimal dispersal of destruction on such 'soft' targets.

Interesting that you unrepentantly never admit when you're wrong about such elementary historical facts, but just move on to other aspersions and disparagements. Of course, you are still the product of your state education...wherever you happen to live. I will pray for both you and MarMema (yet another ugly American?), that you will seek after God in true humility, and seek for his will and grace for your lives....

[Stavka2]

Thanks for the prayer, but I already do. You should follow your own advice. Guess if someone doesn't agree with you, you judge them...real Christian of you. Fundimentalist?

Here, do a little research:
Nuclear Blast Radius
25 megatons: 10 mile radius, over 50% casualties, instantly.
1 megaton: 2.7 mile radius, over 50% casualties, instantly.
Oh yeah, 9 Megatons is just for a bunker....bs.