Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie
"Under some circumstances, the official patrol may permit vessels that can only operate safely in a navigable channel to pass within 100 yards of a U.S. naval vessel in order to ensure a safe passage in accordance with the Navigation Rules "
6 posted on 05/29/2002 1:52:11 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Since when does the Department of Commerce have the Constitutional power to prevent free passage of American citizens on the waters of the United States? That is a War Power. Do we have a declared war? Bush's speech doesn't count.

I can think of a number of navigable channels less than 100 yards wide. Consider the Oakland/Alameda Estuary. A Navy ship at Todd's floating drydock could shut it down. Then there's the Napa River near Mare Island.

The Navy should be in charge of patrolling around their vessels. With container ships arriving and unloading totally uninspected, with those containers having full access to the North American continent, I think we have higher priorities for the Coast Guard than to harass American boaters (no, I don't have a boat), and I CERTAINLY don't think walking on the Constitution is necessary to protect American Naval vessels.

This is just about as dumb as the Federal Deputies inspecting old ladies at airports. Somebody should tell Mineta to unplug his butt and open his eyes. Better yet, he should be fired.

13 posted on 05/29/2002 3:14:21 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson