[Ender@Game.now]

And in Kashmir, it's the Indians who are occupying territory upon which they were supposed to permit a plebiscite but never did.

I think this was a UN resolution after 1947 that India never agreed to. It is not part of the partitioning of the region in 1947. The leader of the province at that time decided to go with India not Pakistan. The Islamists are agueng that he was coerced in making that decision. He did however, choose India.

[cake_crumb]

"I think this was a UN resolution after 1947 that India never agreed to."

Yeah, me too. Actually, I think it was a resolution that India never officially agreed to. That's splitting hairs.

Since I'm already ranting about tired excuses....

WHY IS IT THAT AT THE END OF SO MUCH MODERN TERRORISM LIES A UN RESOLUTION?

Why is it the UN, who's resolutions are the excuse given for so much terrorism, is never part of any possible SOLUTIONS to terrorism...just more problems?