The Indians generally are stating that Pakistan must stop terrorist infiltrators. If so, why are they rejecting Musharraf's suggestion of international monitors along the border? That seems like a positive suggestion to me.
The Indians have nearly a million men on the border right now, and apparently some terrorists are getting through, or were until very recently. I don't understand how destroying the army facing it makes that border less porous. It's a huge border, and without something like the Berlin Wall in place, I don't know how anyone can truly seal it from a determined terrorist.
I spend a lot of time on these threads talking about what India can't do or shouldn't do, but one thing I think they OUGHT to do is to accept Musharraf's offer of the international observers along the LoC. That would have the effect of internationalizing that line as a border. Maybe it would eventually result in a DMZ. In either event, it should cut down or eliminate cross-border terrorism, and it would have the psychological effect on the Pakistani public of a new and permanent border in Kashmir.
That is far better than what is essentially two armies facing each other over a border that neither officially recognizes.