However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.
Especially helpful is the http://www.co2science.org web site for their short summaries of technical documents. I recommend going to http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks. Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched." Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002. They are bite sized and very digestible.
However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.
Especially helpful is the http://www.co2science.org web site for their short summaries of technical documents. I recommend going to http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks. Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched." Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002. They are bite sized and very digestible.
However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.
Especially helpful is the http://www.co2science.org web site for their short summaries of technical documents. I recommend going to http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks. Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched." Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002. They are bite sized and very digestible.
However, to help gain a perspective on this report, it is a good idea to read the opposing scientific viewpoints and for this I am very appreciative of the trouble you went through to provide these links.
Especially helpful is the http://www.co2science.org web site for their short summaries of technical documents. I recommend going to http://www.co2science.org/search.htm and type in "climate change" without the quotation marks. Then select "Return link only if all keywords are matched." Then select the areas of interest and you'll find credible documents with internal links that will give you the ability to credibly refute the assertions made in the Climate Action Report for 2002. They are bite sized and very digestible.