Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Further proof that prohibition doesn't work and in fact makes things worse

puff

dws

1 posted on 06/03/2002 8:55:24 AM PDT by ozone1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ozone1
Sorry this article makes no sense. Where are the communities without access laws if all 50 states have adopted them?
2 posted on 06/03/2002 8:57:57 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ozone1
It sounds like the author is in favor prohibition, just a different sort - prohibitive taxation. They really don't give a rats about teen vs adult smoking, the goal is to prevent anyone from smoking.
3 posted on 06/03/2002 9:07:56 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Puff_List
Puff
5 posted on 06/03/2002 9:09:38 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ozone1
From what I understand it is NOT illegal for a 13 year old to buy cigarettes or posses them. It is only illegal for someone to sell them cigarettes.

The law forbiding the sale of cigarettes to minors is not a failure. The failure is that it is NOT illegal for minors to purchase cigarettes. Pass laws and start fining minors who attempt to purchase cigarettes and minors caught with them in their possesion and it will cause a reduction. Not a great deal of reduction though, as most of the activity would just move 'indoors'. But you will no longer have a gang of 15 year olds at the mall entrance puffing away, and that would be a good thing.

11 posted on 06/03/2002 9:55:16 AM PDT by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ozone1
There is one one thing that this article neglects to mention...

THIS IS NOT A LAW!!!

It is, instead, a regulation. A "law" is something voted into effect by representatives that are accountable to constitutents. A "regulation", which is what this really is, is created by a bureacrat that you will never meet, probably will never even know the name of, and has substantial power to screw up your life with impunity.

18 posted on 06/03/2002 11:53:39 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ozone1
where to start - where to start!!!!

The findings indicate that resources to curb smoking among adolescents may be better directed at other types of interventions such as taxes on cigarettes, smoke-free workplaces and homes, and educational efforts on the health effects of secondhand smoke.

I do not give a darn what the bloody anti-smokers have been denying for years - here it is in BLACK AND WHITE!!!!!! and we all know that the "educational efforts" are nothing short of propaganda brainwashing.

"Given the limited resources available for tobacco control, as well as the expense of conducting youth access programs, tobacco control advocates should start redirecting their energies and funds away from youth access and toward other interventions that have proven effectiveness," write Dr. Stanton A. Glantz and Caroline M. Fichtenberg from the University of California, San Francisco.

First of all this is coming from Stanton Glantz - so we know it is all false - particularly when it comes to talk about money. He is one of THE most highly paid anti-smoker professional nannies in the World. He has publicly stated he will only do research where he knows the results will come out the way "it should." He claims to have a Ph.D in Economics when he has no such thing - his Ph.D is in Mechanical Engineering.

Next, about the only "interventions" that have been proven effective are ones taken in Florida - underage possession or use of tobacco products can result in the loss of a teen's driving privileges. I think that would be a great incentive to avoid using tobacco.

20 posted on 06/03/2002 12:04:13 PM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ozone1
write Dr. Stanton A. Glantz and Caroline M. Fichtenberg from the University of California, San Francisco.

I think these people are beginning to fear their funds will dry up....... they may have to look for a real job.

42 posted on 06/16/2002 10:23:15 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson