Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mascot legislation killed
Scripps-McClatchy Western Service ^ | May 28, 2002 | By JIM SANDERS

Posted on 06/03/2002 8:23:37 PM PDT by vannrox

MINORITY ISSUES


Mascot legislation killed

By JIM SANDERS
Scripps-McClatchy Western Service
May 28, 2002

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - The Assembly rejected legislation to make California the first state in the nation to prohibit public schools or mascots from being named after American Indian tribes Tuesday.

AB 2115 received support from 29 legislators and opposition from 35. Forty-one votes are needed for passage.

Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg, D-Los Angeles, immediately moved for reconsideration Tuesday. She said she will seek a second vote this week.

AB 2115 would ban use of the names Redskins, Indians, Braves, Chiefs, Apaches, Comanches or any other Indian tribal name for public schools or for their athletic teams or mascots.

The prohibition would apply to elementary, middle and high schools, as well as to community colleges and the California State University system.

The measure would not apply, however, to private schools or to the University of California, which is governed by its own board of regents.

Goldberg contends that use of tribal names by public schools is offensive and contrary to the state's obligation to provide an equal education for all.

Indians can feel embarrassment, anger or ridicule because of the use of such names at campus sporting events or rallies, according to supporters of AB 2115.

Coloring a mascot with face paint, plopping feathers into a headband and whooping it up with war dances mock sacred Indian traditions, supporters say.

"It's a simple bill of civil rights," Goldberg told legislators Tuesday.

Dozens of schools statewide have Indian-related campus, team or mascot names, but some - such as Warrior or Brave - are not necessarily tribal and would not be banned by AB 2115.

Opponents mocked AB 2115 on Tuesday, with Monrovia Republican Dennis Mountjoy calling it the "silly bill of the century."

They argued that Indian names are meant as an honor, not ridicule, and that local school districts should decide for themselves what to name their campuses and teams.

Assemblyman Dennis Hollingsworth, R-Temecula, called the bill "political correctness run amok."

Assemblyman Roy Ashburn, R-Bakersfield, argued that nearly every team name - from Gophers to Pirates to Rams - could offend someone.

Ashburn asked tongue-in-cheek whether the name Padres should be banned because it might offend atheists, or Eagles because it might offend bald people.

Assemblyman Joe Canciamilla, D-Pittsburg, said legislators walk a dangerous line - bordering on censorship - when they begin dictating what words can and cannot be used by public institutions.

"It's not our job," he said simply. "It's not our responsibility."

But Goldberg noted that California already has a policy prohibiting personalized license plates from using words that are demeaning, denigrating or discriminatory.

Assemblywoman Judy Chu, D-Monterey Park, supported AB 2115.

"They say these are just words," Chu said of Indian names. "Free speech. Just fun. But it's not just fun to have 80,000 fans in a football stadium screaming, 'Kill the Chiefs.'" Assemblywoman Sarah Reyes said other schools have changed their Indian-related team names without problems.

Supporters and opponents disagreed on whether a majority of American Indians support banning use of tribal names. Each side cited surveys bolstering their position.

AB 2115 would not ban the use of tribal names by an American Indian school.

Goldberg said she would be willing to consider amending the bill to provide exceptions for schools that use Indian names in conjunction with a school-tribal affiliation or partnership.

If approved, the bill would allow public schools to phase-in the purchase of uniforms, stationery and other materials that must be replaced if Indian names are dropped.

Conformance with AB 2115 is expected to cost less than $100,000 statewide, according to a legislative analysis of the bill.

Goldberg recently narrowed the scope of her bill.

Initially, AB 2115 would have required the state Board of Education and California Postsecondary Education Commission to compile - and ban - the use of other names that discriminate against any race, ethnicity, nationality or tribal group.


(Contact Jim Sanders of the Sacramento Bee in California at jsanders(at)sacbee.com.)



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bill; indian; law; liberal; mascot; rally; school; tribal

1 posted on 06/03/2002 8:23:38 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
I'm glad that got stopped. Pehaps now tribal leaders can spend more energy on more important things like improving the general well being of their people.
3 posted on 06/03/2002 8:26:24 PM PDT by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Jones
Funny, I haven't heard any Vikings complain about a local high school team's use of their name. It always seemed to be a compliment to the battle spirit of Native American warriors, with the possible exception of "Redskins".
4 posted on 06/03/2002 8:57:23 PM PDT by skr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Let's see, the state's electricity generation and distribution is a mess, the state's economy is a mess, there is a looming budget crisis, and the state is facing a massive shortfall in funds.

I'm glad we're getting our priorities straightened out.

5 posted on 06/03/2002 9:15:16 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Looney liberals experience a set back! The hard leftists in the Democrat party would destroy this nation if allowed, and are giving it their best shot. Let's keep up the pressure for sanity and the Constitution.
6 posted on 06/03/2002 9:40:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Perhaps Goldberg's bill could be amended to include a requirement that teams shedding their Indian names adopt a new name that reflects inter-ethnic conciliation. Such a new team name might be the "Half Breeds." The "Mulattos?"
7 posted on 06/03/2002 11:20:52 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
What about nicknames refering to whites? Vikings, Fightin' Irish, ect.
8 posted on 06/03/2002 11:21:45 PM PDT by afuturegovernor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson