Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Claim Nickelodeon Promoting Homosexual Agenda
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 6/04/02 | Matt Pyeatt

Posted on 06/04/2002 2:23:49 AM PDT by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A conservative group says Rosie O'Donnell, who recently disclosed her homosexuality, will appear on a Nickelodeon Network program in which children will be asked if they think homosexuality is morally wrong and whether they believe laws are needed to protect homosexuals from discrimination.

Nick News, the program in question, is aimed at viewers between the ages of eight and 13.

While Nickelodeon admits it is "researching and compiling information" about a program focusing on "diversity and tolerance," the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) alleges that the network is lying about its real goal -- promoting the homosexual agenda on a popular kids' television program.

Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the TVC, said the Nick News program is being produced by Linda Ellerbee, a long-time supporter of homosexual causes, according to the TVC, and will feature an appearance by O'Donnell. Lafferty did not reveal the source of her information except to say it came from "insiders."

"It's time for Nickelodeon to get its story straight about their plans to promote homosexuality on their children's network," Lafferty said.

Lafferty said her organization has learned that O'Donnell will be the only adult on the set of the program and will be interacting with children before and during the taping.

"What kind of pro-homosexual message will she be giving these children?" Lafferty asked. "Where's the balance? Why not invite Dr. Laura on the show?" a reference to conservative talk show host Laura Schlessinger.

Lafferty accused Nickelodeon of deception. Despite statements from the network, Lafferty said an article in the Washington Blade newspaper revealed that the program had already completed its research and development phase and that homosexual activists would participate in the show.

"Nickelodeon lied to me twice about the status of this program and the involvement of a homosexual activist group in its production. Nickelodeon's leadership cannot be trusted to tell the truth about this show. I was also told that Nickelodeon would not ask children invasive questions about homosexuality, but I have a copy of the questions that will be asked. I consider them inappropriate," Lafferty said.

According to the TVC, it has obtained the following questions intended for the program.

What do you think about homosexuals -- do you think it is morally wrong to be a homosexual? Why or why not?

Many kids these days are growing up in families that are non-traditional (have 2 moms, or 2 dads) -- What do you think about that?

Many schools are bringing issues about homosexuality and diversity into classrooms -- do you think these kinds of things should be taught in school? Why or why not?

Do you think homosexuals are discriminated against because of who they are?

Do you think we need laws to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination -- why or why not?

David Bittler, senior communications director for Nickelodeon, refused to acknowledge whether the questions were in fact being planned as part of the program. However, he insisted the Nick News program was still in the early stages of production.

"The claims being made by the Traditional Values Coalition are unfounded if not misguided. Nick News is researching and compiling information for a special focusing on issues of diversity and tolerance with specific attention to the issue of same-sex parented families," he told CNSNews.com via email.

Bittler also stated that the program has not been taped and that content would be evaluated to make it appropriate for his audience.

"The special has not yet been produced, and any presumption of its content is premature. In the tradition of Nick News, the content will be totally age appropriate for our viewers," Bittler said.

He refused further comment on the subject.

Lafferty said any homosexual message is inappropriate for Nickelodeon viewers.

"The truth is that Nickelodeon is working with the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD) to promote this show. GLAAD's whole purpose for existence is to push positive portrayals of homosexuality in the media," she said.

Lafferty also said Nickelodeon has "blocked its main email address and is not accepting emails from concerned parents."

When parents call to voice their disapproval over the show, "they're being given the runaround," Lafferty charged.

Nickelodeon does not have an official target date for airing the program, but the TVC claims it has information that the network plans to air the program in mid-June.

The TVC is urging its supporters to sign a petition voicing their disapproval of the program. Lafferty said the petition would be delivered to Nickelodeon.

See Related Story:

New on TV: Search for a Playboy Playmate


E-mail a news tip to Matt Pyeatt.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 06/04/2002 2:23:50 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"What kind of pro-homosexual message will she be giving these children?" Lafferty asked. "Where's the balance? Why not invite Dr. Laura on the show?"

Because balance would shed "Light" on the topic, and "you-know-who" cringes and hides from the "Light".
Some diversity, what a bunch of detestable hypocrites.
Oh, there WILL be "wailing and gnashing of teeth".

2 posted on 06/04/2002 4:05:36 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
ah, yes. Now I remember why we turned the cable off.
3 posted on 06/04/2002 4:14:40 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I really, REALLY resent how O'Donnell has turned Nick into her own personal plaything.

Spongebob Squarepants is ASEXUAL, dammit!!

4 posted on 06/04/2002 4:18:52 AM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I believe Nick is owned by MTV...why should we expect less?
5 posted on 06/04/2002 4:21:17 AM PDT by aardvark1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
No more "Bob the Builder" for MY five year old daughter! Nuff Said!
6 posted on 06/04/2002 5:31:23 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Bump for later...
7 posted on 06/04/2002 5:46:58 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
This just in....NAMBLA announces they are now the primary sponsors of Rugrats (TM). Nickelodeon will introduce a long lost uncle, Uncle Wickle Pickle, who will convey their message to the show's fans.
8 posted on 06/04/2002 5:54:07 AM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
I have always said that Rugrats will be the first cartoon to promote homosexuality
9 posted on 06/04/2002 6:14:02 AM PDT by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doodad
I recently got cable in my house. Nickelodeon is the one channel that I have programmed out. Why would anybody let a TV network dump whatever they want into his child's brain. Kids hook into Nickelodeon and they will watch all day long. Does anybody really trust the corporate owners of Nickelodeon that much?
10 posted on 06/04/2002 6:16:08 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is the Fashion World Ready for an Openly Heterosexual Designer?
11 posted on 06/04/2002 6:21:40 AM PDT by Hillary's Folly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I say leave them alone and let them get the show produced and "in the can"...THEN, when the evidence is on tape, let Ashcroft & company swoop in and subpoena the program before it hits the air so they can comb it for evidence of contributing to the delinquency of minors, child sexual abuse (persuasive intent), and a whole slew of other such charges!

This could make for the biggest case against perversion in history...Think about it...It's not just some bozo in a raincoat in an alley trying to talk your CHILD into sexual awareness & activity, this is a NETWORK led by Ellerbe & O'Donut trying to do it on a massive scale by airwaves!

12 posted on 06/04/2002 6:22:11 AM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
I recently got cable in my house. Nickelodeon is the one channel that I have programmed out.

I have DirecTV and have programmed out Nickelodeon as well as other channels.

I believe the person who started Nick was Geraldine Claybourne (sp?).
She is a radical feminist who is one of the founders of the Oxygen channel (also deprogrammed in my house).

13 posted on 06/04/2002 6:22:17 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Do you think homosexuals are discriminated against because of who they are?

Shouldn't that read as "...because of WHAT they are..>"?

Do you think we need laws to protect gays and lesbians from discrimination

Sounds like 'Reverse Discrimination' to me. Why should any person have a Special Book of Laws, simply because they are Sodomites ??

14 posted on 06/04/2002 6:27:13 AM PDT by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
New on TV: Search for a Playboy Playmate
Three of the twelve women who started out on this show were from the Cleveland area. >:)

-Eric

15 posted on 06/04/2002 6:31:41 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wonder what age groups will be represented by the children on this show? I won't be surprised if Nick has kids ranging in age from 1st grade (6 years old) and up.
16 posted on 06/04/2002 6:44:08 AM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
No surprise from MTV owned Nickelodeon.
17 posted on 06/04/2002 6:46:16 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3catsanadog
Never mind - I spotted the sentence - 8 years to 13. Then I read the entire link and somewhere it said that the kids were already claiming they were homosexual. An 8 year old knows this already?
18 posted on 06/04/2002 6:49:13 AM PDT by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"the program in question, is aimed at viewers between the ages of eight and 13.
This topic is not suitable for children in that age group. I really didn't believe all the hooplah over the "gay agenda" until we purchased a CD on U.S. History for children "ages 6 & up". And - whaddaya know - "gay rights" was a main topic on the CD. My 6-year-old doesn't even know about heterosexual sex yet. Good thing we looked it over first. We returned it for a refund.
19 posted on 06/04/2002 7:00:10 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
And - whaddaya know - "gay rights" was a main topic on the CD.

As if that has anything to do with U.S. History. Good for you for returning it. BTW, where did you purchase it and who (if you remember) produced it?

20 posted on 06/04/2002 7:07:14 AM PDT by scan58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson