Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airborne Laser Aircraft Poised For First Flight
Jane's Defence Weekly | June 5, 2002 | Michael Sirak

Posted on 06/04/2002 6:50:14 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Of all the new weapon systems planned for the US Air Force (USAF), service leaders say they consider the Airborne Laser (ABL), like the F-22 Raptor air-supremacy fighter, truly transformational because it will revolutionise warfare.

Now, after almost a decade of development, the USAF and Missile Defense Agency (MDA) are poised to begin flying the first ABL test aircraft in the next several months and move what they say is one step closer to an operational system.

Loitering at altitudes around 40,000ft, the ABL system is designed to destroy boosting ballistic missiles with a multi-megawatt laser beam that travels at the speed of light over great distances. The high-energy beam, which will be about the diameter of a basketball, will heat the side of a missile until it fails structurally and tumbles to earth. Ideally, ABL programme officials say, the missile, along with its payload, will land on the territory of those who launched it.

The ABL system is carried aboard a modified Boeing 747-400F commercial freighter aircraft. It will house a high-energy chemical oxygen iodine laser (COIL), sophisticated beam-control system with adaptive, 'deformable' mirrors to accurately point and fire the laser through atmospheric disturbances, and a battle management, command-and-control system that can simultaneously track and prioritise potential targets.

The USAF will operate the ABL fleet, but the MDA has funding responsibility and management authority while the system is under development.

Boeing spent 20 months modifying the 747 test aircraft at its facility in Wichita, Kansas, starting in January 2000. The company leads a contracting consortium called 'Team ABL'. It is also responsible for total weapon system integration and the system's battle management element. Lockheed Martin is developing the beam-control and fire-control segments. TRW is supplying the COIL system and providing ground support.

The aircraft modifications included replacing the aircraft's nose with a turret for the laser and beam-control optics, adding steel struts to reinforce the body and titanium supports to the underbelly and placing an airtight bulkhead in the interior to separate the crew from the aircraft's laser modules.

Final ground tests are under way on the test aircraft, which is dubbed the YAL-1A Attack Laser. It will fly initially without the COIL and beam-control systems, both of which are still undergoing developmental work. USAF Col Ellen Pawlikowski, who heads the ABL system programme office at Kirtland Air Force Base (AFB), New Mexico, on behalf of the MDA, said she does not expect the aircraft to fly with these two components until early 2004.

The flight-test activities will begin with air-worthiness tasks like validating the ability of the aircraft to refuel in the air and land safely, Col Pawlikowski said. Exercises of the aircraft's battle management and infra-red detection sensors will follow to assess the aircraft's ability to distinguish ballistic missiles from aircraft.

Concurrent to the flight activities, Lockheed Martin will continue to assemble and integrate the beam-control system at its facility in Sunnyvale, California. TRW is producing the six flight laser modules (LMs) that will compose the COIL in the test aircraft; the objective ABL aircraft are expected to have 14 LMs. It will integrate them at the ABL System Integration Laboratory at Edwards AFB, California. In January, the company completed a series of tests at its Capistrano Test Site in southern California that validated the ability of the first module, LM-1, to achieve a power level of 118% of its required output.

Programme officials are also working at Edwards AFB to refine the battle management's Active Ranger System, which will sit in a pod atop the aircraft and determine the range to a target.

Once programme engineers have integrated all of these battle management elements on to the test aircraft in early 2004 at Edwards AFB, the YAL-1A will begin engaging a variety of targets ranging from missile-shaped objects dropped from balloons to target boards attached to high-flying aircraft. The flight programme will then culminate in late 2004 with up to three live, end-to-end intercept attempts of 'Scud-like' threat-representative short-range ballistic missiles.

If successful, the aircraft would then undergo additional evaluation as part of the overarching, multi-layered Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) the MDA is pursuing to protect the USA, US forces deployed abroad, and allied and friendly nations from ballistic missile attack. As part of the BMDS developmental activities, Col Pawlikowski expects that the ABL test aircraft would begin engaging missiles with greater ranges. Equally important, the aircraft would also be available as part of the MDA's Block 2004 suite of elements that could provide a limited operational capability in a contingency, she noted.

The USAF wants the ABL to have a lethal range of at least 200 miles (320km). Programme officials say that, under the Bush administration, the ABL's ability to engage missiles of intermediate and even strategic ranges will be determined only by its technical capabilities and not limited by policy restrictions.

Programme officials estimate that the operational ABL system will have enough onboard chemical 'fuel' to shoot down 20 to 40 missiles before having to land to replenish. In addition to missile defence, the ABL will have inherent capabilities to perform other activities like engaging threat aircraft, temporarily blinding enemy satellites, performing imaging surveillance and providing cruise missile defence. Col Pawlikowski noted, however, that the programme is not currently pursuing these other missions.

The cost of the programme since its inception and up through the initial missile shootdown exercises will be under $2 billion, Col Pawlikowski said. The MDA has requested $598 million for ABL in Fiscal Year 2003, including $85 million to initiate the purchase of the second ABL aircraft, known as the Block 2008 variant. It will incorporate improvements over the YAL-1A, but will still be a test aircraft and not a refined operational system.

The size of the ultimate ABL fleet remains to be determined.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: miltech

1 posted on 06/04/2002 6:50:14 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

2 posted on 06/04/2002 6:52:40 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Cool!!! I wonder if this weapon can be used to melt the side of mountains and "superheat" bunkers?
3 posted on 06/04/2002 6:54:31 AM PDT by Maringa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The thing I don't understand is this: if this is a defensive weapon, is it going to be practical to have these 747's flying around the clock over enemy territory? How would the enemy allow these aircraft to overfly their territory? What is the range of these weapons?
4 posted on 06/04/2002 6:56:44 AM PDT by Maringa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maringa; Poohbah
It's called air surpemacy. The F-22 and the F-16 will clean out the bad guys within hours. Then, the ABLs can set up shop. A more powerful laser would be a good thing, though...
5 posted on 06/04/2002 7:01:43 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen;miltech
Thanks for posting this!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

6 posted on 06/04/2002 7:03:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maringa
I am working with team ABL for the AF. The ABL will stand off out of harms way.
7 posted on 06/04/2002 7:05:57 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maringa
What is the range... ?

Nobody seems to say... Here"'s the FAS page on the topic; Boeing has a web site here. Lots of pretty pictures and nice words, but not a syllable I can find about the range. Maybe they won't know for sure until they get it airborne and try it out, but they must have some goal.

AB

8 posted on 06/04/2002 7:07:32 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

"That wasn't the only change to the ABL 747. The chemical reaction that produces the lethal laser is a violent event, capable of killing anyone nearby, so the revised aircraft's fuselage will be bisected by a solid wall amidships. It's called a "1,000 bulkhead," located 1,000 inches, or roughly 80 feet, from the aircraft's front tip, and will isolate the two pilots and four weapons specialists who make up the crew."

I see dead people.

9 posted on 06/04/2002 7:10:14 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maringa
From the article: "The USAF wants the ABL to have a lethal range of at least 200 miles (320km)."
10 posted on 06/04/2002 7:15:13 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Hmm...range: 200 miles. Velocity of weapon: speed of light. Targeting system: precision. Size of impact: basketball. Effect on target: melting. Missile defense? Nah...what we have here is the worlds greatest sniper rifle. Go ahead, Castro, give that speech to your communist flunkies from the stadium tomorrow....
11 posted on 06/04/2002 7:24:25 AM PDT by egarvue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
eeewww...... you'd have to sandblast castro off the back wall..... if you could find the wall
12 posted on 06/04/2002 7:37:39 AM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
That would sure light up his cigar. Not sure it would have any other effect; the man seems invulnerable to assassination attempts.
13 posted on 06/04/2002 7:39:12 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Stand Watch Listen
Who in that airplane is going to detect and shoot a Chinese missile down on 3 minutes notice? Seems impractical in the execution to me.
15 posted on 06/04/2002 8:07:35 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Who in that airplane is going to detect and shoot a Chinese missile down on 3 minutes notice? Seems impractical in the execution to me

The first versions of weapons are often seen by many at the time of their introduction as being impractical.
16 posted on 06/04/2002 8:45:20 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Given that the range is only 200 miles, I think this is intended as a theater ballistic missile defense. The article only says ballistic missile, not ICBM. Our defense against ICBMs uses EKVs launched from missiles.
17 posted on 06/04/2002 8:46:55 AM PDT by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
First, take the stated range and at least double it. A lot of this is fluff designed to mislead the Usual Suspects as to this weapon's true capabilities.

The U.S. is basically going to start investing in a fleet of these things, sort of like "airborne battleships". The beam itself will probably be adjustible (that is, narrowed) from your basketball sized shotgun blast to a precision pencil point.

Naturally, that tall, white robed, Arabic-lookin' feller in the turban is history once this thing gets a bead on him.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

18 posted on 06/04/2002 9:04:50 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: egarvue
Go ahead, Castro, give that speech

Opening sequence of the movie "Real Genius".

19 posted on 06/04/2002 11:14:03 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson