Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: johnqueuepublic
This guy can kiss my red white and blue butt.

I will NEVER vote for or against someone for national security reasons.

I will vote because the candidate is the best man for the job.

This piece is an insult to all Americans.

6 posted on 06/04/2002 9:34:07 AM PDT by Vladiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vladiator
On earth, what the heck does that mean?

National security isnt important?

okfyne

14 posted on 06/04/2002 10:04:02 AM PDT by johnqueuepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vladiator
Never underestimate the power and agenda of the media!
21 posted on 06/04/2002 10:09:51 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vladiator
vote for or against someone for national security reasons

That's right. If a Democrat gets in instead of Bush in 2004, he might be far tougher on Alqaida and the others than Bush is. When military action is required, party doesn't matter at all.

43 posted on 06/04/2002 11:54:16 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vladiator
WHAT?!!!! The best person for the job — man or woman — is the person who will put the security of this nation at the top of his or her administration's agenda. Since George Washington, our country's chief executive has also always been the Commander in Chief. First among the President's duties and responsibilities has ALWAYS been the security of this nation. The first cabinet positions were the Secretaries of State, War and Treasury, for heaven's sake!
51 posted on 06/04/2002 12:22:41 PM PDT by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson