Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Distance Themselves from the Brady Bunch
Front Page Magazine ^ | June 4, 2002 | Tanya K. Metaksa

Posted on 06/04/2002 9:51:14 AM PDT by hattend

Leopards don't change their spots, nor can one blindly vote along party lines. Tough choices on an ever-changing political battlefield. Of course, if our elected officials were simply held to their oaths of office to "uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States", all of this would be a much lesser problem...

Bottom line: The "Brady Campaign" is just the most prominent of many left-wing organizations whole ultimate goal is to disarm the nation.

***

Democrats Distance Themselves from the Brady Bunch
Tanya K. Metaksa
FrontPageMagazine.com | June 4, 2002

WITH AN EVER WIDENING split in the Democratic Party on the issue of gun control, Sarah Brady and her group, are still working hard to keep the issue viable in the political arena. The Brady bunch, formerly known as Handgun Control, Inc., are trying new tactics as Americans' enthusiasm for gun control has lessened and Democrats are reassessing the issue.

According to an ABCNEWS.com Poll "Americans overwhelmingly agree with the Justice Department's new position that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of citizens to own guns.After hearing the Second Amendment verbatim, 73 percent in an ABCNEWS.com poll said it guarantees the right to individual gun ownership. Twenty percent said, instead, that it only guarantees the right of states to maintain militias." This year's poll found a reduction of 10 points since 2000 in the number of Americans who favor "stricter gun control laws", and "strong" support for gun control down to 39% - its lowest since 1992 when Bill Clinton became President.

Under the leadership of Bill Clinton the Democratic Party was almost in lockstep with the Bradys. At the 1996 Democratic convention Sarah and Jim Brady were featured prime time speakers promoting their gun control agenda. Yet, during those dark years for law-abiding gun owners there were a few bright spots in the Democratic Party. Three Democratic Governors, Zell Miller of Georgia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, and Jim Hunt of North Carolina, bucked the national trend and supported gun owner interests.

With Clinton's influence on the Democratic Party non-existent and political pundits acknowledging that Al Gore's loss of such states as his home state of Tennessee, West Virginia, and Florida came from disaffected Democratic gun owners, many Democratic candidates are distancing themselves from supporting gun control issues and the gun ban groups.

The 2001 Virginia governor's race was the first indication of change. Because the incumbent governor is not allowed to run for re-election, every four years the Virginia governor's race pits two non-incumbents against each other. A Democrat, Mark Warner, ran against Virginia Attorney General Mark Earley. Warner, distinguishing himself from previous Democratic gubernatorial candidates, openly courted the endorsement of the National Rifle Association (NRA). That courtship kept the NRA from supporting Mark Earley as it had supported the successful gubernatorial candidacies of George Allen and Jim Gilmore.

According to a Washington Post article of October 26 Warner had successfully defused the "gun control" issue and kept NRA's political muscle out of the campaign. A last minute letter from NRA calling Earley "clearly a better candidate" was hardly enough to change minds in Southern Virginia where Warner had been courting Democratic gun owners for months. As Warner's campaign manager, Steve Jarding, stated "We've reached out to all groups in this campaign, including hunters and gun owners, and we endorse Second Amendment rights,"

Warner has since demonstrated his support for law-abiding gun owners by signing a bill passed by the Republican dominated Virginia legislature that overturned Alexandria's ban on concealed weapons in public buildings. The NRA reciprocated by sending its Virginia members an orange postcard asking them to thank the governor for his support.

This change in Democratic attitudes is forcing the Brady bunch to use new tactics. When U.S. Senator Zell Miller gave the keynote speech at the NRA's Annual Meeting Banquet in April, they sent their members an e-mail that asked everyone to "call Senator Miller" and express unhappiness with Miller' s speech to the NRA. One pro-gun activist called the number and asked how many calls had come it. The answer was "sixty"-- a number far short of the NRA members who gave Zell Miller a standing ovation for his speech.

Several days after Miller's NRA speech, an article in USA Today reported on a conference call among Southern governors:

"Most of the governors in Monday's conference call with reporters -Roy Barnes of Georgia, Don Siegelman of Alabama, Jim Hodges of South Carolina, Mike Easley of North Carolina, Ronnie Musgrove of Mississippi and Parris Glendening of Maryland -- agreed that guns played at least some role in Gore's defeat. And they made clear that they are comfortable with the gun culture."

Of all those Southern Governors the Brady bunch has only one supporter: Governor Glendening.

This has forced the Brady bunch into making early political endorsements, something they very rarely did in past elections. In March they came out endorsing Congresswoman Lynn Rivers (D) in the August 6 Democratic primary for Michigan's newly drawn 15th Congressional District. Thanks to redistricting Rivers, a four-term Congresswoman, has been thrown into a bitter primary against Congressman John Dingell, a leader of pro-gun Democrats. In their press release the Brady bunch touts Rivers as a "committed advocate for stronger gun laws' and her election is one of their "top priorities."

Then on May 21 they sent out a press release endorsing California's Governor Gray Davis for re-election. "In a video endorsement, Mrs. Brady praised Gov. Davis for his unwavering support for common sense gun laws and compared his strong record of leadership on gun safety to the dubious one of his opponent, Bill Simon."

In a country that according to ABCnews.com "few think new laws would substantially reduce violent crime, or would be more effective than better enforcement of current laws," the Brady bunch is trying to bring back the halcyon days when Clinton bashed the NRA. Yet, even one of their strongest champions, Senator Chuck Schumer stated in a May 8 press release "the broad principle that there is an individual right to keep and bear arms is shared by many Americans, including myself." Even Schumer agrees that the gun control issue is a loser for many of his fellow Democrats and is backing off "strong" support for gun control. He understands what it takes to remain in the majority in the U.S. Senate.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; bradybunch; democrats; guns; nra; secondamendment
Joe Brower...I left your comments in at the beginning of the article because you said it better than I ever could.

If this was posted already, my search failed.

1 posted on 06/04/2002 9:51:15 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hattend
As Warner's campaign manager, Steve Jarding, stated "We've reached out to all groups in this campaign, including hunters and gun owners, and we endorse Second Amendment rights."

I don't know why this statement bothered me. Rather than "endorse" I would have said, "protect and defend".

2 posted on 06/04/2002 9:54:23 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower;bang_list
I posted your e-mail...break out the ping lists
3 posted on 06/04/2002 9:58:18 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Thanks! Except for one typo --> "whole" = "whose". D'oh!


4 posted on 06/04/2002 10:03:01 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
Bang
5 posted on 06/04/2002 10:42:13 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Senator Chuck Schumer stated in a May 8 press release "the broad principle that there is an individual right to keep and bear arms is shared by many Americans, including myself." Even Schumer agrees that the gun control issue is a loser for many of his fellow Democrats and is backing off "strong" support for gun control. He understands what it takes to remain in the majority in the U.S. Senate.

It's the peskey "shall not be infringed" part that he keeps forgetting about...sure you can keep and bear arms...but only the ones we approve for you...and only once we register them for later confiscation.

By distancing themselves from the failing gun control issue democrats like Schumer expose themselves as people of low/no integrity.

If gun control really was an issue they cared about, like they've been spouting about for 10 years, one they felt they needed to implement to keep the children safe then they would not so easily abandon it.

Rats leaving a sinking ship...

6 posted on 06/04/2002 11:27:02 AM PDT by in the Arena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: in the Arena
It's the peskey "shall not be infringed" part that he keeps forgetting about...sure you can keep and bear arms...but only the ones we approve for you...and only once we register them for later confiscation

You're too kind. Schumer lied...pure and simple...because he wants to keep his job.

Like Daschle, he runs his campaign from the middle right and, when elected, votes from the far left. He counts on the apathy and short attention span of the average New York voter to stay in office

7 posted on 06/04/2002 12:04:59 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hattend
"This change in Democratic attitudes is forcing the Brady bunch to use new tactics. When U.S. Senator Zell Miller gave the keynote speech at the NRA's Annual Meeting Banquet in April, they sent their members an e-mail that asked everyone to "call Senator Miller" and express unhappiness with Miller' s speech to the NRA. One pro-gun activist called the number and asked how many calls had come it. The answer was "sixty"-- a number far short of the NRA members who gave Zell Miller a standing ovation for his speech."

Insert nelson muntz 'ha ha' laugh here. Hopefully the pendulum will swing towards the side of freedom a little more.

BTW, here's a salute the the heroes of the gun control movement.
-------------------------------------------
FlashBunny.org - Second Amendment Multimedia Propaganda

8 posted on 06/04/2002 12:15:40 PM PDT by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend
The problem for the gun-confiscation crowd is this –

All those who wish to be disarmed already are.

Those who aren't have no interest in joining their ranks.

9 posted on 06/04/2002 12:21:02 PM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend;bang_list
Going Home BTTT
10 posted on 06/04/2002 5:08:11 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend
Parris Glendening is a "Southjern governor"?
My *ss!

Does Tanya think NY's Pataki is a Southern governor too?

It doesn't matter what they say, Dimocrats are always going to favor gun-control in the end, because that's what their national leadership tells them to do, and most are incapable of independent thought.

11 posted on 06/05/2002 6:17:40 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson