Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69
I thought Australia rejected Kyoto over a year ago.

Oh well, if they want to stick another knife into it's rotting bloody carcass, good for them.

4 posted on 06/05/2002 9:43:52 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead
Under the pact, industrialised nations must cut emissions by an average five percent by 2012 from 1990 levels, but 55 nations producing 55 percent of world carbon dioxide emissions -- the main greenhouse gas -- must ratify the pact to make it binding.

I need a little help here...if the US doesn't ratify Kyoto, then how can it be binding on us?

In practical terms, did our refusal to ratify kill this monster regardless of what anyone else does?

6 posted on 06/05/2002 9:52:36 AM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson