Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Laws Governing Weightlifting in Prisons
Strength-Tech ^ | 1999 FR post 6-6-2 Note the attached update | by Strength Tech, Inc.

Posted on 06/06/2002 2:13:24 PM PDT by vannrox

1999 Federal Laws Governing Weightlifting in Prisons
by Strength Tech, Inc.

The current laws governing weightlifting in federal prisons come from the large annual appropriations bill. The bill provides the Federal Prison system with its operational budget for Oct. 1, 1998 to Sept. 30, 1999 and lists certain things (including weight lifting equipment) that budget money can not be expended for. The restrictions are commonly referred to as the Zimmer Ammendment, and they have been added to the bill for the last several years. When the restrictions first occurred, the Federal Bureau of Prisons responded with a question and answer document to further interpret the restrictions to their recreation staff.

In January 1999, Congressman Bob Franks of New Jersey introduced a bill (HR 370) similar to the original Zimmer bill and to the bill he introduced in 1997. Among other things, it calls for an outright ban of weightlifting in both state and federal correctional institutions. States will lose truth in sentencing incentive grants if they do not comply.

SUMMARY

(AS INTRODUCED)

No Frills Prison Act - Amends the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to require a State, to be eligible for truth in sentencing incentive grants, to demonstrate that it: (1) provides living conditions and opportunities within its prisons that are not more luxurious than those that the average prisoner would have experienced if not incarcerated; (2) does not provide to any such prisoner specified benefits or privileges, including earned good time credits, less than 40 hours a week of work that either offsets or reduces the expenses of keeping the prisoner or provides resources toward restitution of victims, unmonitored phone calls (with exceptions), in-cell television viewing, possession of pornographic materials, instruction or training equipment for any martial art or bodybuilding or weightlifting equipment, or dress or hygiene other than as is uniform or standard in the prison; and (3) does not provide, for a prisoner serving a sentence for a crime of violence which resulted in serious bodily injury to another, housing other than in separate cell blocks intended for violent prisoners, less than nine hours a day of physical labor (with exceptions), any release from the prison for any purpose unless under physical or mechanical restraint, any viewing of television, any inter-prison travel for competitive sports, more than one hour a day spent in sports or exercise, or possession of personal property exceeding 75 pounds in total weight or that cannot be stowed in a standard size U.S. military issue duffel bag.

Directs the Attorney General to establish similar conditions in the Federal prison system.

No Frills Prison Act (Introduced in the House)


HR 370 IH

106th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 370

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to prevent luxurious conditions in prisons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 19, 1999

Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


A BILL

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 to prevent luxurious conditions in prisons.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF LUXURIOUS PRISON CONDITIONS.

STATUS: Detailed Legislative Status

House Actions

Jan 19, 99:
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Feb 25, 99:
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime.

Strength Tech comment: Interesting that the bill has NO co-sponsors, vs. having about 30 in 1997. We do not expect this bill to come out of committee, but it is an indicator the issue is not dead.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: act; ban; bars; budget; jail; justice; law; nofrills; operational; police; prison; weightlifting
Strength Tech comment: Interesting that the bill has NO co-sponsors, vs. having about 30 in 1997. We do not expect this bill to come out of committee, but it is an indicator the issue is not dead.


1 posted on 06/06/2002 2:13:25 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Too bad they don't exercise their brains as much as their biceps!
2 posted on 06/06/2002 2:26:07 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It has always been the heighth of insanity to me to provide those proto-humans the equipment they need, along with the anabolic steroids that flow in like all other drugs via corrupted correctional officers, to pump themselves up to 250 lbs! They can actually use a short prison sentence as a means to make themselves more vicious predators when they leave than when they checked in.

If they want an exercise yard, fine. They can do push-ups, crunches, run laps, and do everything necessary to maintain basic fitness. But damn giving them time and means to become a monster on the taxpayer dime.

3 posted on 06/06/2002 2:54:53 PM PDT by winin2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
AZ got rid of weights in state prisons.
4 posted on 06/06/2002 4:14:11 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: winin2000
If they want an exercise yard, fine. They can do push-ups, crunches, run laps, and do everything necessary to maintain basic fitness. But damn giving them time and means to become a monster on the taxpayer dime.

I'm opposed to even that much--feed them junk food that clogs their arteries and fattens them up, give 'em all the smokes they want so they have no lung capacity.

I'd give 'em a chinning bar--but make them do chinups a la that classic movie The Lords of Discipline.

5 posted on 06/06/2002 4:17:48 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Guess the guys who are prison b***** will have to stay that way now that they can't buff up to the level of the guys who have already been weightlifting LOL.
6 posted on 06/06/2002 8:56:19 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
My father worked for the California Dept. of Corrections for 25 years, most of that time as a guard. I once asked him what one change within the prison would he make if he had the authority to do so. Without any hesitation, he said "I'd get rid of the inmates' weightlifting equipment". He always thought that it was kind of ridiculous for the prison to provide a means for the inmates to build up their muscles and strength. My father said it just makes it that much more difficult for the prison guards to handle and control the inmates.
7 posted on 06/06/2002 9:11:23 PM PDT by usadave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson