Posted on 06/06/2002 2:29:38 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
http://www.aapainmanage.org/AAPM/AAPM_Lit/MemberStateProfOH.pdf
Here's what I found on a guest page at http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:zugCA5XvFUsC:www.geocities.com/bisher_rihani/view_guestbook.html+Khalid+Elgindy+islamic&hl=en:
"Dear ALL, As I sated in my last message on the copts digest, we are now getting started with our public campaign. The first issue we are addressing is extremely important and you MUST act FAST before it is too late. Background: The US Commission on Religious Freedom, which was established by an Act of Congress in late 1999, is planning a visit to Egypt on March 19, 2001(next week). The commission has employed among its staff an Egyptian Muslim Named (Khaled Elgindy) as an analyst. The commission is planning on visiting Egypt in two weeks and hopes to use Mr. Elgindyy as a translator. "(snip)
" ...The next point is, how in the world did the commission chose to have an Egyptian Muslim analyzing the Coptic struggle in Egypt, keeping in mind that Mr.Elgindy is a Muslim with extreme views (not a moderate one). If the situation was reversed, would the Islamic community have allowed the US commission to employee a Serb (Christian) as a researcher on the Kosovo issue? I bet NOT. I belive the US commission on Human Rights have made an enormous mistake in handling this issue. I with other copts have met with the commission privately and asked them to address this issue, but we have not received a favorite response yet. In addition, I have raised the issue in the last public meeting held by the commission (last Friday)and have yet to receive a response" ....(snip)
Now is the time that the commission hears from all of you in writing. This is unacceptable and will result in the Coptic struggle being misrepresented at the highest authority on Human Rights in the USA.... Your letter should be addressed to: The Honorable Elliott Abrams Chairman U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom 800 North Capitol Street NW Suite 790 Washington, DC 20002 "
"Khaled Elgindy is currently a policy analyst for a federal commission. Prior to that he served for two years as political action coordinator for the Arab American Institute in Washington, DC where he worked on various domestic and international issues of concern to the community. He previously served as press secretary for Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, and as a program officer for the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Khaled has a master's degree in Arab Studies from Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and BA in Political Science from Indiana University."
Cached source of http://leb.net/~erik/Activism/Conference3.html
Khaled Elgindy is National Coordinator for Political Action at the Arab American Institute in Washington, DC. Khaled represents AAI on a number of national coalitions, including the National Iraq Network, and is responsible for mobilizing Arab-American action on various legislative issues. In May 1998, he joined a delegation of Arab-American activists on a humanitarian mission to Iraq and to observe the effects of sanctions first hand. Khaled previously served as Press Secretary to Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA), who at the time became the first member of Congress to oppose military action against Iraq and has since called for the lifting of sanctions against the Iraqi people. He has a master's degree from Georgetown University's school of foreign service and a bachelor's degree in Political Science from Indiana University.
Reps. Bonior, John Conyers, and Carolyn Kilpatrick, all Michigan Democrats, have since early May been circulating a letter in the House regarding the humanitarian situation in Iraq. The letter points out the deterioration of the food, sanitation, and medical situation in Iraq since the Gulf war, and calls upon President Clinton to “look squarely at the economic sanctions, which have outlasted their political utility.”
The letter asks Clinton to lead the U.N. sanctions committee in allowing the importation of spare parts for the oil industry; to improve the monitoring and oversight mechanisms to provide quicker movement of relief supplies to civilians; and to change the stifling U.S. regulations that hinder the flow of humanitarian supplies to Iraq.
In June the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee sponsored a congressional briefing to publicize the letter. Roman Catholic Bishop Thomas Gumbleton of Detroit spoke at the briefing and described the deplorable health conditions he found during his recent visit to Iraq. In July, the Arab American Institute (AAI) sponsored a similar congressional briefing, at which Khaled Elgindy of the AAI showed slides of his visit to Iraq and Carl LeVan of Representative Conyers’ office described the letter in detail and urged the staff members in attendance to encourage their congressmen to sign on. LeVan said that the letter will probably not be sent until October, so as to get as many signatures as possible.
So far, those signing the letter, in addition to Bonior, Conyers, and Kilpatrick, include Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Tom Campbell (R-CA), William Clay (D-MO), Eva Clayton (D-NC), Danny Davis (D-IL), Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Diana DeGette (D-CO), William Delahunt (D-MA), Elizabeth Furse (D-OR), Alcee Hastings (D-FL), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL), Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Bill Jefferson (D-LA), Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), John LaFalce (D-NY), James McGovern (D-MA), Cynthia McKinney (D-GA), James Oberstar (D-MN), John Olver (D-MA), Major Owens (D-NY), Lynn Rivers (D-MI), Ciro Rodriguez (D-TX), Bobby Rush (D-IL), Bernard Sanders (I-VT), Pete Stark (D-CA), Bart Stupak (D-CA), Bennie Thompson (D-MS), Maxine Waters (D-CA), Melvin Watt (D-NC), and Lynn Woolsey (D-CA).
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=17577394
Learn how to read.
Now show me where it states that the sale took place on 9/10. Because I don't see it in what you posted.
However it doesn't specifically say he sold 9/10. So it may be correct that he didn't sell 9/10. The federal prosecutor quoted seems to be choosy about the language. Were it not for the implications one might call the quoted prosecutor "careful" here.
Seems the prosecutor suggests that Elgindy wanted to sell 9/10 based on possible preknowledge.
Seems like implications have been made but "care" has been taken not to go further.
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=17579548
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=17521513
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.