To: DWC
You are misinformed.
He spoke to his broker AFTER the market closed on 9/10 regarding their planned meeting on 9/11. The sales in the accounts (custodian accounts for his kids) took place about 9/18. Do the facts make any difference to your opinion?
To: There's millions of'em
WSJ article said he sold 9/10.
Where do your facts concerning a sale date of 9/18 come from?
To: There's millions of'em
Check again..one reported claim is that he called his broker sometime around Noon - 12:30 pm...market would still be open even if the broker he called was using pacific time.The broker couldn't liquidate for technical reasons to due with the account...and therefore the stocks weren't sold until after the market reopened.
He made a post after the attack claiming he was short 65 stocks and stood to make alot of money from the market falling. The post still exists.
To: There's millions of'em
You are misinformed. You better do some more research http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?msgid=17517111&s=stockwatch
To: There's millions of'em
I just read your post tonight. Where in the article does it state he notified his broker after the close, unless you know something I don't. Is that why you're defending him?
25 posted on
06/07/2002 9:02:12 PM PDT by
DWC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson