Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FresnoDA
Hair DNA is only subject to female DNA typing? (I can't spell it) So, would it be possible to tell the difference, for sure, between Danielle's hair in RV and Brenda's? I think Westerfield's defence it going to atleast suggest that Brenda was in that RV, probably having sex with DW. Could blow the case wide open. They've lived two doors away for 4 years.
7 posted on 06/06/2002 10:37:46 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: John Jamieson
On another board, it was mentioned that you do this kind of dna matching with hairs without the roots. I believe they found both kinds of hairs though, so I'm not sure why only this test was done.
33 posted on 06/07/2002 7:36:47 AM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: John Jamieson
It would be possible to tell the difference between Danielle's and Brenda's hair. Brenda's is chemically treated...Danielle's wasn't.
44 posted on 06/07/2002 8:56:07 AM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson