Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State Patrol begins random searches at ferry docks
The Seattle P-I ^ | June 7, 2002 | Hector Castro

Posted on 06/07/2002 5:07:04 PM PDT by Eala

State troopers have launched an aggressive campaign to boost security on Washington State Ferries by randomly searching vehicles while their owners wait to board.

The searches are ostensibly voluntary, but motorists who refuse can be denied passage by the captain of the boat.

State Patrol and ferry service officials said the heightened security reflects an increase in funding for inspections, rather than a response to a specific threat.

"It comes down to providing protection for our citizens," Washington State Patrol Capt. Glenn Cramer said yesterday.

But officials of the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington immediately expressed outrage at the searches.

"It's a big, big problem," said ACLU attorney Jerry Sheehan. "This is an unconstitutional activity on the part of Washington state employees."

Sheehan said his group, which learned of the searches after being contacted by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, will discuss the issue with the state Attorney General's Office and the State Patrol.

"In the state of Washington, you have a right not to be searched by the government unless the government believes that you are intending to do wrong," he said. "We simply do not allow the government to conduct fishing expeditions."

Troopers concentrated efforts at the Southworth ferry landing, west of Vashon Island, earlier in the week, ferry system spokeswoman Susan Harris said.

Yesterday, clipboard-toting troopers were at the Winslow terminal on Bainbridge Island for the morning commute. They checked every 15th vehicle, asking drivers if they had any explosives or weapons in the car. Drivers were asked to produce identification and a vehicle registration, and then to open the trunk and all other storage areas. License numbers and other information was noted on a form.

The State Patrol is not saying when or where troopers will conducting the random searches.

"If a practice becomes predictable, it can be overcome," Cramer said.

Troopers patrolled ferries and inspected some vehicles after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, but did not conduct random searches. The security measures were dropped some months later because of budget constraints.

Cramer said the new level of scrutiny was made possible by a $1.8 million budget increase approved by lawmakers earlier this year. The random inspections follow a recommendation of the Washington State Ferries Security Committee, Cramer said. The committee comprises representatives from the State Patrol, the Coast Guard and state ferry system employees.

In addition to making the preboarding inspections, troopers will be more visible riding aboard ferries, Cramer said.

"The consensus was that we needed an increased presence on the vessels and the terminals," he said.

While the inspections are voluntary, the troopers still have leverage over motorists. Motorists who decline are reported to the ferry captain, who has the authority to stop them from boarding.

Yesterday, ferry Capt. Tim Koivu did just that when a man in line for the 7:50 a.m. sailing of the Wenatchee declined to let troopers look through his car at the Winslow dock.

"I think if I was sitting next to a guy in a car that wouldn't let the police officer search it, I'd be concerned what he's hiding in there," Koivu said later. "Our main concerns are just the safety of the passengers, the vessel itself and all the crew members. We have close to 2,000 passengers on here."

Koivu said he once before declined to take on a passenger who refused to be searched -- it was just after the Sept. 11 attacks.

"We do a lot of things differently than we did prior to Sept. 11," he said.

Some of those measures, he acknowledged, can be inconvenient to passengers, "But everybody's understanding that it's for the good of all concerned," he said.

State Patrol officials said the Attorney General's Office has issued an opinion saying that the searches are legal, which Sheehan said he has not yet seen.

Sheehan said the ACLU hopes to reach people who have been searched, or who have refused to be searched, adding that the fact that a refusal could result in a missed ferry ride makes it hardly voluntary.

"You have the right not to be searched as long as you don't want to travel freely in the state of Washington any longer," he said. "That's not voluntary."

But Cramer said extraordinary times call for unusual measures.

"This is a special-needs time," he said, adding that the searches "will continue as long as we're in this state of heightened awareness."

Cramer said the ferry searches are part of an overall increase in vigilance rather than a response to a specific threat, such as the recent effort by FBI agents who contacted owners of scuba diving shops in the region. The agents asking about people who might have inquired about underwater pilot or demolition training.

In late May, FBI national headquarters issued a warning that "recent information has determined that various terrorist elements have sought to develop scuba diver capability. There is a body of information showing the desire to obtain such capability."

Seattle-based FBI spokesman Ray Lauer said agents have so far contacted about 50 diving shops around the state. He declined to say what exactly agents were asking, or whether they had found any valuable leads.

The owner of one Seattle-area store said two agents stopped by her shop last Friday, asking for a list of everyone who took classes there during the last three years.

The agents also "wanted to know if anyone had been in to make large purchases of gear who had no knowledge of the gear whatsoever," said Dawn Ulrich, manager of the Lighthouse Diving Center in North Seattle.

Ulrich said the agents were particularly curious about anyone who may have paid for such gear with cash.

Having to consider these types of things about her potential scuba customers or students felt odd, Ulrich said. Before Sept. 11, she said, "we never really gave it much thought."

P-I reporter Sam Skolnik contributed to this report. P-I reporter Hector Castro can be reached at 206-448-8126 or hectorcastro@seattlepi.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: ferries; identification; police; search
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Drivers were asked to produce identification...
While the inspections are voluntary

Welcome to the People's Soviet of Washington, citizen -- may I see your papers please?

1 posted on 06/07/2002 5:07:04 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eala
I wonder how long it will take the boot-licking contingent to show up and tell us that we have to right no travel via ferry.
2 posted on 06/07/2002 5:14:26 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
4th amendment bump.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

3 posted on 06/07/2002 5:19:35 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
This is just plain wrong.
4 posted on 06/07/2002 5:25:04 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
This is just plain wrong.

C'mon. Aren't you "with us"? Because if you're not, you must be "with Al Queda".

/sarcasm

5 posted on 06/07/2002 5:28:50 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
OH... I'm with you alright. Random searches are stupid and counterproductive and a waste of time. If they want to search cars, that's fine as long as it isn't merely a pathetic poke at the 4th amendment.

Search a rented car driven by two middle eastern men that just sit in the car and don't talk to anyone or each other? You bet. Search under the paint. But just search every 15th car? Stupid.

6 posted on 06/07/2002 5:38:03 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Random searches are stupid and counterproductive and a waste of time. If they want to search cars, that's fine as long as it isn't merely a pathetic poke at the 4th amendment

It's all about conditioning us to accept tyranny.

7 posted on 06/07/2002 5:41:23 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Quit spoouting such radical, extremist ideas.
8 posted on 06/07/2002 5:43:03 PM PDT by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye
At the same time, the ACLU can kiss my hiney...
9 posted on 06/07/2002 5:46:54 PM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
It's all about conditioning us to accept tyranny.

I'm not persuaded that it's a deliberate attempt to condition us to accept tyranny, but it certainly has that effect, it's yet another step in that direction. Just look at Capt. Tim Koivu's remark. The mere fact that someone has refused to allow the search makes that person guilty -- he is hiding something!

It is extremely rare that I take a ferry, and now maybe I won't again (the long waits were always unpleasant enough). But at least I'll be spared the sight of our wee little fuhrer goose-stepping from one bridge of his Washington State Ferry to the other. He's not guilty of masterminding any particular insidious plot, he's not conscious of doing anything wrong, but he's mindlessly profiting from it and he's promulgating it -- he's another example of Arendt's "banality of evil."

10 posted on 06/07/2002 6:03:28 PM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
No, I don't give them that much credit. It's about trying to be perceived as doing something and protecting their butts from the inevitable next attack. They can say they tried.
11 posted on 06/07/2002 6:03:56 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eala
This is of course outrageous.

However in addition to the other issues described above, note that the state has several proposals to raise taxes including state patrol and roadway funding under circumstances where they have so much money they are funding something absurd like this--this activity results not from some threat but from funds being appropriated by the legislature to do it under circumstances where they also need to go back to the people for more money to do other things they need to do.

12 posted on 06/07/2002 6:32:16 PM PDT by David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
Well that just sucks.
Guess the traffic over the Tacoma Narrows Bridge is going to increase.
Maybe everyone should purchase their own personal hovercraft to commute across the sound with.
13 posted on 06/07/2002 8:36:28 PM PDT by Chewbacca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
They checked every 15th vehicle, asking drivers if they had any explosives or weapons in the car.

I decided to have some fun with this. I sent an email to WSDOT-Ferries from their website and asked them if it was against the law to take a firearm on the ferry boat. Since the ferry system is an extension of the state highway system and since an unloaded firearm in a case out of the drivers compartment is legal on roads and furthermore since in the ferry system published safety rules, they only prohibit gas cans, connected propane tanks and oxygen tank, but not firearms, I asked if I go deer hunting in the Olympic Peninsula, do I have to drive around.

I further pointed out that the WA Dept of Fish & Wildlife has a special deer hunting permit available to all hunters in the state with places like the San Juan Island Game Management Unit and that in the state's hunter safety class or the hunting regulations there is nothing that says firearms are prohibited from ferry boats. If you can't take a firearm on a ferry boat, there is no practicle way to hunt much of the San Juan Island Game Unit which is pistol or shotgun firearm restricted. (Honestly state trooper, I was just following the regulations set up by the Dept of F&W! That's why I have a scoped revolver and shotgun in my car.)

I demanded to know if there were any regulations prohibiting the transport of firearms prior to the drawing for the state special deer permit season by F&W as it would impact my choice of Game Units I applied for.

It will be interesting to see what they say.

14 posted on 06/07/2002 11:07:45 PM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
State Patrol and ferry service officials said the heightened security reflects an increase in funding for inspections, rather than a response to a specific threat.

Obviously they were given too much funding. Another example of why giving bureaucrats excess money works against the taxpayer.

15 posted on 06/08/2002 12:25:21 AM PDT by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
The State Patrol is not saying when or where troopers will conducting the random searches.
"If a practice becomes predictable, it can be overcome," Cramer said.

What's so pathetic about this is that it's so easily defeated. Just post observers near all the (few) ferry terminals. When the troopers show up at one, the others are "free." Or, if you don't have that much personnel, wait and observe one terminal until the troopers arrive then leave. Now it's "free." (There's an even easier exploit mentioned in the article, but why go on?)

Your tax dollars at work, making you safer. Right.

16 posted on 06/08/2002 8:35:53 AM PDT by Eala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Please ping me when you get your response.....
17 posted on 06/08/2002 8:41:24 AM PDT by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
Please post the response to your letter because it's quite a brilliant set of questions.
18 posted on 06/08/2002 8:46:19 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eala
"We simply do not allow the government to conduct fishing expeditions."

Yeah, right. Been to an airport lately? Airplanes...ferries...what's the difference?

19 posted on 06/08/2002 9:35:49 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eala
This is all worth it so long as the cheap oil flows.
20 posted on 06/08/2002 9:37:16 PM PDT by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson