To: SJackson
Yes, I would agree but at least to the "ruling elite" some tyranny is necessary for the "good of the..." or "it's for the children.....
78 posted on
06/11/2002 5:57:22 PM PDT by
lawdog
To: lawdog
Yes, I would agree but at least to the "ruling elite" some tyranny is necessary for the "good of the..." or "it's for the children.....You're the lawdog (I have three wonderful retrievers, curly and flat, unlawful critters), so I get to say F the "ruling elite" and the "lawful tyranny" that justifies, an "elite".
God bless the Republic.
79 posted on
06/11/2002 6:43:32 PM PDT by
SJackson
To: lawdog
BTW, Re 79, I'm not into tyranny nor anachism. 2/3 of FR is radical, 1/6 is sick, the other 1/6 is for the lurkers.
God Bless the Republic anyway.
80 posted on
06/11/2002 6:48:48 PM PDT by
SJackson
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson