Replies

But, if you accept his data and assumtions as true, then it paints a picture of male homosexuals as much more likely than their heto counterparts to be child molestors.

If you accept his data -- then it means MALES are more likely than FEMALES to be molestors. Should we banish MALES then?

If you accept his data -- then it means MALES are more likely than FEMALES to be molestors. Should we banish MALES then?

You’re confused, as usual, gender and behavior are mutually exclusive elements.

If you accept his data -- then it means MALES are more likely than FEMALES to be molestors.

This comes as a surprise to you?

"If you accept his data -- then it means MALES are more likely than FEMALES to be molestors. Should we banish MALES then?"

"Banish" them to where? Your reply makes no sense. Are you saying that if this data is correct then all males should be segragated from all children? No, I believe that cure would be worse than the disease. IF this data and the underlying assumptions are correct then it tells us that we should be very hesitant to put our male children in situations where they could be alone in the company of male homosexuals. Understand, however, that I offer no opinion on whether the data and assumptions in this study are sound as I have no idea whether these underlying variables have been subject to peer review or professional scrutiny. I merely comment on the correlation your original post failed to pick up on.