Simon and Schuster admitted its decision to place the book on its "youth list," which is aimed at children as young as 13, would be controversial.
1 posted on
06/10/2002 7:16:41 AM PDT by
H8DEMS
To: H8DEMS
You know, many young boys look up to older boys as what they'd like to be (stronger, more assured, more popular, etc. etc.) But what the homosexual groups want is to take any young kid who knows virtually nothing about sexuality, and push him into the homosexual lifestyle before he's even had a chance to let his sexuality develop naturally and normally - and before he's even had a chance to develop the natural and normal attraction for girls. They are kid snatchers. And they seek to act without parents' knowing or consenting to what's going on. It is an evil trade they ply.
To: H8DEMS
Well, isn't that lovely. (barf!)
To: H8DEMS;Khepera;JMJ333;ArGee;EODGUY
Invasion of the Baby Snatchers.
4 posted on
06/10/2002 7:29:52 AM PDT by
Dakmar
To: H8DEMS
To: H8DEMS
I don't feel like contributing today. ~~~ Wait until you see "Unable to locate server"
I don't have money. ~~~ Help with the fundraiser. Bump the threads, ping your FRiends.
There's plenty of time to donate. ~~~ Bill collectors don't see it that way.
I don't know where to contribute. ~~~ Credit card, mail: FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 , Paypal: JimRob@psnw.com
I've got too many other things to do first. ~~~ Don't we all?
I can't contribute much, what's five dollars. ~~~ If everyone contributed one dollar a month, we'd never have a fundraiser again.
The dog ate my credit card. ~~~ Shoot the dog.
Just let me finish freeping. ~~~ BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Don't wait until it's too late. Do it today. Do it now! Free Republic is funded solely by us. It's up to us to keep it running. Do your part, contribute if you can. Bump the fundraising threads. Help keep this place alive!
8 posted on
06/10/2002 7:35:01 AM PDT by
WIMom
To: H8DEMS
FWIW, I noticed that in the S&S U.K. website, the entry for
Strange Boy contains no description.
To: H8DEMS
How sweet. A "positive" book about a ten year-old boy who has a crush on a male teen. A book that seeks to normalize adult-child homosexual perversions by pitching them not as pedophilia, but as as wholesome homosexual "love."
I'd call it gerontophilia. Either way, NAMBLA will be thrilled.
To: H8DEMS
Heterosexuality doesn't have to rush around in fits trying to get people to accept it as a norm: it IS the norm. All of history, all of biology, all of reality supports heterosexuality.
Homosexuality will forever be known, even if only intuitively, to be a distortion of reality...no matter what window dressing and applause it is given.
25 posted on
06/10/2002 4:45:27 PM PDT by
avenir
To: H8DEMS
How about shelving some nice books about students who want to blow their teachers away with guns and razor blades?
THAT would be bad, but screwing with a 13 year old's mind isn't?
How messed up is that?
26 posted on
06/10/2002 4:49:15 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
To: H8DEMS
In California about 1978, they had an ballot initiative called (if I recall correctly) the "Briggs initiative" that would have banned homosexuals from teaching in public schools. One of the arguments made for the initiative was that absent such a ban, children in public schools would be exposed to pro-homosexual propaganda and recruitment. The anti-initiative groups, including of course the "gay rights" groups, poured scorn on the idea that gays as teachers would eventually mean a gay educational agenda in the taxpayer-funded public schools. The intiative was defeated. And its proponents were right.
To: H8DEMS; maryz; jackd
I would argue that the real controversy of Strange Boy lies in the fact that it's not making a big deal out of having a gay child as its protagonist I'm sure that's why they call him "strange boy".
_________________
Jackd:
I wasn't trying in the least to rationalize homosexuality. I was merely making mention of what I'd observed and experienced. Homosexuality is exactly a dis-ordered desire and consumated in a way that is unnatural to the body ... both for its mechanics and its utter separation of the sex act from procreation.
31 posted on
06/10/2002 10:30:13 PM PDT by
Askel5
To: H8DEMS
I thought child porn was illegal.
To: H8DEMS
"Some people will doubtless pick up on the gay elements of the book, which are treated frankly and honestly, as being shocking and controversialHow's this for honest and shocking: there's no such animal as a gay 10-year-old.
Animals.
36 posted on
06/11/2002 12:55:27 PM PDT by
LTCJ
To: H8DEMS
Any book promoting underage sex isn't acceptable. But even liberals think a book touting the joys of adolescent butt plugging is still too avant garde for our politically correct any thing goes culture. And I suspect this is just the kind of reading material pedophiles like. No wonder its having a hard time finding readers!!!
To: H8DEMS
"NEA spokesman Darryl Figueroa said just because a book appears in British schools and libraries doesn't mean it will find its way to the U.S. "I wouldn't necessarily see that as a natural jump," she said." In other words: "Criminy! They found out about it. Now we'll have to find some other way to get it in like 'Heather Has Two Mommies'."
40 posted on
06/12/2002 7:37:18 AM PDT by
Slyfox
To: H8DEMS
Look at the ages involved. I don't know anyone that would recommend a book in which a high school freshman male (age 14) has a relationship with a 4th or 5th grade female (age 10).
41 posted on
06/12/2002 9:18:48 PM PDT by
weegee
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson