Interestingly, James Kallstrom had the same erroneous knee jerk reaction and blew away the better part of $40,000,000 of the texpayers' money before having to admit that no evidence of a missile or bomb was found in the recovered wreckage.
The Massive Fireball explosion, informally estimated to have been 2000 feet in diameter, filled the sky at about 5500-7500 feet at approximately 8:31:47 - long after the wreckage of the 747 started descending.
FIRO is demanding access under the Freedom of Information Act to the very evidence you claim does not exist. The autopsy reports of 89 passengers list shrapnel of "unknown origination" and the origin of these metal shards WAS NOT INVESTIGATED. In addition, other reports show that the "pelletized" shrapnel WAS analyzed and "contained zirconium and barium" in sufficient quantity to be noted. Neither of these elements was expected to be found and ARE consistent with high explosive ordnance!
Quit pounding your damn drum about the "witness myth". Only you believe that hundreds of eye witnesses did not see what they reported. Nobody here who has bothered to investigate and read the reports and analyze the data for themselves are swallowing your line of bunk! Go somewhere else!
SO, let me get this right. You are on the CENTER WING TANK explosion side. Correct?
Then answer me this. If the CWT explosion caused the plane to blow apart and the wreckage to fall from 13000+ feet, why did it all wait until it got to 5500-7500 feet to burn?
Why are you the only one that believes your story ? ( well, you and _Jim)
Sir accepting for the sake of argument the above statement is true, this nether proves or disproves the reason for the loss of the aircrafts nose an 13800 ft.
Witnesses can provide support to prove or disprove the reason for the loss of TWA800
No witnesses to the event to TWA800 at 13800 ft can not.. prove or disprove the reason
Your point, even if true does not in an of itself rule a missile out as the cause of the loss of the aircraft, does it?