Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yooper
The "missile(s) shootdown" tinfoil hats have been spreading misinformation about the Flight 800 disaster for nearly six years now because they all made the same erroneous assumption at the outset, that the Massive Fireball explosion was at 13,800 feet at 8:31:12

Interestingly, James Kallstrom had the same erroneous knee jerk reaction and blew away the better part of $40,000,000 of the texpayers' money before having to admit that no evidence of a missile or bomb was found in the recovered wreckage.

The Massive Fireball explosion, informally estimated to have been 2000 feet in diameter, filled the sky at about 5500-7500 feet at approximately 8:31:47 - long after the wreckage of the 747 started descending.

19 posted on 06/10/2002 5:55:12 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Asmodeus
Asmodeus, you are an idiot with a one theory fits all approach to the evidence... if it doesn't fit YOUR theory, it doesn't exist. There are more than several witnesses who saw and described the entire events including the later occuring massive fireball that occured AFTER the initiating explosions.

FIRO is demanding access under the Freedom of Information Act to the very evidence you claim does not exist. The autopsy reports of 89 passengers list shrapnel of "unknown origination" and the origin of these metal shards WAS NOT INVESTIGATED. In addition, other reports show that the "pelletized" shrapnel WAS analyzed and "contained zirconium and barium" in sufficient quantity to be noted. Neither of these elements was expected to be found and ARE consistent with high explosive ordnance!

Quit pounding your damn drum about the "witness myth". Only you believe that hundreds of eye witnesses did not see what they reported. Nobody here who has bothered to investigate and read the reports and analyze the data for themselves are swallowing your line of bunk! Go somewhere else!

72 posted on 06/11/2002 12:57:54 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Asmodeus
I also have a hard time believing that any radar tracked a missile. Too small too fast. I have watched SM1s on radar and you have to be looking for it and it is still hard to see. In addition most civilian ATC use transponder data and not video.
88 posted on 06/11/2002 6:35:11 AM PDT by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Asmodeus,_Jim
The Massive Fireball explosion, informally estimated to have been 2000 feet in diameter, filled the sky at about 5500-7500 feet at approximately 8:31:47 - long after the wreckage of the 747 started descending.

SO, let me get this right. You are on the CENTER WING TANK explosion side. Correct?

Then answer me this. If the CWT explosion caused the plane to blow apart and the wreckage to fall from 13000+ feet, why did it all wait until it got to 5500-7500 feet to burn?

Why are you the only one that believes your story ? ( well, you and _Jim)

226 posted on 06/12/2002 6:46:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Asmodeus
...The initial explosion was not seen by any known witnesses...

Sir accepting for the sake of argument the above statement is true, this nether proves or disproves the reason for the loss of the aircrafts nose an 13800 ft.

Witnesses can provide support to prove or disprove the reason for the loss of TWA800

No witnesses to the event to TWA800 at 13800 ft can not.. prove or disprove the reason

Your point, even if true does not in an of itself rule a missile out as the cause of the loss of the aircraft, does it?

251 posted on 06/13/2002 4:13:06 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson