We've covered this already. Incest between consenting adults is okay if there is no reasonable risk of deformed offspring. Otherwise the health of a third person is involved.
Bestiality -- well one side isn't talking, so having it "illegal" is a law in name only. Virtually unenforceable no matter how you feel on the subject.
And of course pedophilia involves minors not capable of consenting in a meaningful sense.
Homosexuality between consenting adults risks no offspring and aggresses against no minors. Therefore, no, all three are not "co-equal" no matter how many times you say it.
Except for those who already have genetic defects, right hypocrite? Thanks for agreeing.
Bestiality -- well one side isn't talking, so having it "illegal" is a law in name only. Virtually unenforceable no matter how you feel on the subject.
So says you. Property doesn’t need a voice Mr. PETA.
And of course pedophilia involves minors not capable of consenting in a meaningful sense.
Of course they can, an emancipated individual only needs an adult IQ of 70, just above “mental capacity”, to do so. Only arbitrary law prevents this. Of course if the legislature said it was OK that should be all right with you...
Homosexuality between consenting adults risks no offspring and aggresses against no minors. Therefore, no, all three are not "co-equal" no matter how many times you say it.
Bring some logic to that argument and you win.
Whoops sorry, again you are agreeing.