Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
I think it was Michael Barone who did a similar analysis, and on Brit Hume's show the other night when they were talking about redistricting (due to the census), I think they said that "Bush states" had a net gain of 7 or 8 seats over "Gore states".

So the news might even be rosier for 2004.

5 posted on 06/18/2002 2:57:30 PM PDT by NYS_Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NYS_Eric
I hadn't heard. :) That is great news. And I firmly believe the President's popularity would be enough today to carry the close states of Oregon, New Mexico, Wisconsin and Iowa. It would be a stompin' of Algore.
7 posted on 06/18/2002 3:02:56 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: NYS_Eric
Here is the difference in the Electoral College:

Before Reapportionment:

2000 -- Bush 271; Gore 267

After Electoral Reapportionment:

2004 -- Bush 278; Gore 260

That would be the number of electoral votes that Pres Bush would receive if he won the same States in 2004 he did in 2000!

9 posted on 06/18/2002 3:04:59 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: NYS_Eric
Net net, high tax (Dem states) are losing population to lower tax (GOP states).
31 posted on 06/18/2002 7:07:45 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson