To: Recovering_Democrat
I think it was Michael Barone who did a similar analysis, and on Brit Hume's show the other night when they were talking about redistricting (due to the census), I think they said that "Bush states" had a net gain of 7 or 8 seats over "Gore states".
So the news might even be rosier for 2004.
5 posted on
06/18/2002 2:57:30 PM PDT by
NYS_Eric
To: NYS_Eric
I hadn't heard. :) That is great news. And I firmly believe the President's popularity would be enough today to carry the close states of Oregon, New Mexico, Wisconsin and Iowa. It would be a stompin' of Algore.
To: NYS_Eric
Here is the difference in the Electoral College:
Before Reapportionment:
2000 -- Bush 271; Gore 267
After Electoral Reapportionment:
2004 -- Bush 278; Gore 260
That would be the number of electoral votes that Pres Bush would receive if he won the same States in 2004 he did in 2000!
9 posted on
06/18/2002 3:04:59 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
To: NYS_Eric
Net net, high tax (Dem states) are losing population to lower tax (GOP states).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson