Skip to comments.
Board backs firing teacher(appeared in homosexual porno film)
Florida Sun Sentinel ^
| 6/19/02
| Bill Hirschman
Posted on 06/19/2002 8:43:48 AM PDT by LarryLied
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:40 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: jlogajan
The administration's petition contends Vanchieri was "paid to remove all of his clothing and perform various sexual acts alone as well as with another man." Perhaps you missed this? Your comment re. Kirk Douglas is inane. If you cannot see the difference between a) pretending to lead a slave revolt in front of a camera and b) actually engaging in homosexual acts in front of a camera, I pity you.
To: Tai_Chung
The fact that this IS even debated shows the absolute moral decline of our society. FIRE the B******!
22
posted on
06/19/2002 12:00:03 PM PDT
by
jackd
To: ArrogantBustard
b) actually engaging in homosexual acts in front of a camera Rock Hudson played leading men in heterosexual roles. Was he therefore heterosexual?
23
posted on
06/19/2002 12:21:13 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
Thank you for proving my point. Kirk Douglas pretended to lead a slave revolt. Rock Hudson pretended to romance women. Anthony Vanchieri is alleged to have actually engaged in homosexual sex acts. No pretense involved. The presence of a camera is irrelevant.
To: jlogajan
Rock Hudson played leading men in heterosexual roles. Was he therefore heterosexual?
I certainly don't recall seeing him doing Doris Day. Or vice versa.
To: ArrogantBustard
actually engaged in homosexual sex acts So if Rock Hudson ever made love to a woman, what would he be, hetero or homo?
26
posted on
06/19/2002 12:32:11 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
That would make him a switch-hitter. Bisexual. Still a pervert, IMO, but not quite the same sort of pervert as an exclusive homo. Nice try with the false dichotomy, BTW. You argue like a democRAT. I hope it's just acting.
AB
To: ArrogantBustard
So the actual physical contact with same gender gentitalia determines if the person is homo or hetero (or bisexual), right?
So if a priest molests a young boy, the boy is homosexual, right?
28
posted on
06/19/2002 12:43:04 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
Were you trained by the Jesuits? You've certainly learnt the fine art of hair splitting. You left out "doing it willingly". The boy is a rape victim, which tells us something about his ability to defend himself but nothing about his 'sexuality'. But you already knew that. I hope. In fact, I think you're just amusing yourself by bandying semantics. Goodbye.
To: LarryLied
"I believe that everyone has a right to a personal lifestyle," the Fort Lauderdale High junior said. Yep! But when your personal lifestyle is on camera, its not personal anymore.
To: Dimensio
In middle school. We had a gay history teacher who was spending WAY too much time with some of the boys. We also had a lesbian Asst Principal and her lover was a music teacher.
To: ArrogantBustard
Were you trained by the Jesuits? I'm not sure why you automatically leap to ad hominem. I am asking a series of Socratic type questions. Don't get overwrought about it.
There are homosexual acts and then there are homosexuals. A homosexual act is simply touching the genitalia of a same membered gender. Somehow we have to leave doctors touching patients out of this -- but that's a problem for you to figure out.
A homosexual, on the other hand, is someone who has a preference for same genders.
See the distinction? You can be one without the other (you can be a homosexual who has never had sex with anyone) or you can perform homosexual acts (genital touching) without being a homosexual.
32
posted on
06/19/2002 2:11:12 PM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
See the distinction? I see a distinction without a difference. I see sophistry, and the bandying of semantics. I see presumptuous arrogance (Socratic questioning, indeed!). BTW, a Jesuit education used to be a good thing: Philosophy, Theology, the natural sciences and the liberal arts. They've fallen off the mark somewhat in recent years, though.
To: jlogajan
Well, he'd still be a homosexual. Because he primarily had a tendency to the same sex, and that makes him a homosexual, a disordered person by the recent standards of Western society, pre-reversion. V's wife.
34
posted on
06/19/2002 2:39:25 PM PDT
by
ventana
To: jlogajan
No, you are wrong. If the will leans towards same sex attraction but is checked by the mind and in unity with the spirit and a controlled will does not give in to the temptation, you are not a homosexual. If you do give into the temptation without even touching another, you are a homosexual by intent. Similarly, if your on screen intent is to give the impression of homosexual lust as presented by on screen behaviour, you must have the cooperation of the will, mind and spirit to be convincing. Your wrong. V's wife.
35
posted on
06/19/2002 2:43:49 PM PDT
by
ventana
To: ventana
Your wrong should be You are wrong! (and you are).V's wife.
36
posted on
06/19/2002 2:44:59 PM PDT
by
ventana
To: DoctorHydrocal
The real question is just how did this guy get on Temptation Island 2? Either he lied through his teeth, or their screening process is inadequate. Why would you ever want to risk allowing a gay or bisexual male on a show where the goal is to hook up with one or more female participants. Can you spell HIV/AIDS?
37
posted on
06/19/2002 2:46:04 PM PDT
by
CdMGuy
To: CdMGuy
How much you want to bet the producers are gay? A lot of people in tv land are, which is why the shows are so weird, and the depiction, not to mention degradation, of women so severe. V's wife.
38
posted on
06/19/2002 2:51:06 PM PDT
by
ventana
To: CdMGuy
Somebody should clue in
www.womansown.com about Tony. From their website:
Meet the boys of Temptation Island 2 anyone youd want to get stranded with? "A woman who is in a relationship with me can expect the best time of her life, I hope!" declares 6'0" Anthony Mark Vanchieri. This fun-loving 26-year-old Florida elementary physical education teacher, describes himself as "high on life 24/7, always smiling and filled with lots of Italian love." The type of woman who would most appeal to this captivating charmer would be "someone who laughs, loves to have a great time and will be a great mom for our kids," says Anthony. "But more important she would have to have my mother's approval."
Women can write to Tony at the site.
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson