Replies

Thanks for the kind words. Don't get me wrong, I am not a Slobo supporter per se. He's definitely a slick politician who funneled lots of money into the pockets of his family and supporters. And he should be held accountable for that - in Serbia, not by Slick Willie's henchmen at the Hague.

I also agree that he's a "non-nationalist"; anyone who's actually read his allegedly infamous speech at Kosovo Polje in 1989 can see it's quite full of praise for multi-culturalism and is in fact quite the opposite from "inciting Serb nationalism", as has been implied (and even falsely quoted) by the mainstream press ad nauseum.

But you see, that is exactly why I support him very much in his fight at the Hague. It seems clear to me that he's being railroaded, that his trial is a sham and nothing better then the show trials put on by the Soviets. The sole purpose of the show at the ICTY is to try to put a stamp of legitimacy on NATO's intervention by finding old Milo guilty. It's an attempt to whitewash the historical record by dismissing the entire series of wars as being caused by Serb nationalism inflamed by a vile demagogue. Mr. separatist "Islamic Declarations" Izetbegovic is not at fault for the violence, the drug-running upstanding members of the KLA are not at fault, it's all Serbia's fault. I'm sure even you can agree that's a load of bull. That's why Slobo has my full support at the Hague.

What don't you understand about this source being fatally compromised?

We'll debate something else, some other time, but I will not afford the ideological descendants of Marx, Engels, and Mao the dignity of a response.

You're looking for me to debate through proxy the ideological equivalent of NAMBLA here, and I'm not doing it.

Enjoy your rotten candy, kids, and watch your backsides.