Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoplite
I must admit you've made a pretty good point, and it's hard to argue with it. :(

As far as the communists/socialists are concerned, all I actually wanted to say is that even among them there are differences, not all of them are Leninists, Maoists, Stalinists or Milosevic supporters. Even if they critisize NATO or the Hague court, it doesn't mean they like Milosevic or the kind of policy. I also wouldn't throw them automatically in the same bag as Neo-nazis that support Hitler and his policy. Especially since many of them don't promote a hateful, intolerant or even violent actions as is the case with the neo-nazis.

As for believing people, I would definetely research the matter on my own, no matter how close they may be to me in ideological views or in any other way. I don't take everything for granted, that's for sure.

72 posted on 06/23/2002 11:46:28 AM PDT by bluester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: bluester
No worries - some of the milder forms of socialism, such as Sweden, seem to do alright, at least if one judges by the voter's acceptance of a system given free and fair elections. In those instances, an exchange of ideas is perfectly suitable for gaining knowledge and a fresh perspective.

On the other hand, proponents of failed systems, who carry their beliefs forward through historical denial and revisionism, hold no interest for me.

They are curiosities to be viewed for amusement purposes only.

And yes, trust is earned, whether talking about friends, pundits, government spokespersons, or even fellow Freepers.

73 posted on 06/23/2002 4:46:52 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson