Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US 'to attack Iraq via Jordan'
The Observer (U.K.) ^ | 07/07/2002 | Jason Burke, Martin Bright and Nicolas Pelham

Posted on 07/06/2002 5:28:54 PM PDT by Pokey78

Military planners prepare to use British forces in an allied assault within months

American military planners are preparing to use Jordan as a base for an assault on Iraq later this year or early in 2003, The Observer can reveal.

Although leaked Pentagon documents appear to show that Turkey, Kuwait and the small Gulf state of Qatar would play key roles, it is believed that Jordan will be the 'jumping-off' point for an attack that could involve up to 250,000 American troops and forces from Britain and other key US allies.

Jordan, with good roads and communications, would be perfect for the launch of an American armoured force, military analysts say. Its capital, Amman, is linked to Baghdad by a 600-mile motorway that cuts through a virtually featureless desert - perfect terrain for US tanks and high-precision air-launched munitions.

Iraqi dissidents in Amman have told The Observer that hundreds of American advisers have arrived in Jordan in the past few months.

The Amman-based Iraqi National Accord (INA), which contains many of the key military dissidents, has held talks in Washington about plans for a strike on Iraq. They expect the US to begin with intensive bombing and missile raids launched from the Gulf and Turkey, leading to a military rebellion within Saddam Hussein's elite Republican Guard.

The INA, they say, could play a military role from Jordan. They envisage a military coup, leading to transitional military rule.

Eye-witnesses claim preparations are under way at the Muafaq Salti air base in Azraq, 50 miles east of Amman on the road to Baghdad.

Ten days ago the Jordanian news agency, Petra, reported that the head of the US Central Command, General Tommy Franks, met Jordan's chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Lieutenant-General Khalid Jamil Surayrih.

The agency said 'the two sides reviewed the general situation in the region and areas of co-operation between Jordanian and US armed forces...' Officially, Jordan is opposed to a war on Iraq, but informed sources said that there is a tacit agreement on the issue between the Jordanian government and Washington.

The US has apparently given Jordan and other Arab states the freedom to pay lip-service to support for Iraq.

News of a military build-up coincides with a US attempt to wean Jordan from its deep economic ties with Iraq, and some observers see a growing military role for Jordan in the country once ruled by its Hashemite royal family.

'Jordan's role will be that of Pakistan in the US-Taliban war,' said a prominent Jordanian analyst. Jordan's economy is inter-woven into Iraq's, and the kingdom shares a close military and economic alliance with the US.

Others say Jordan will pay a heavy price for co-operating with an attack. 'A US strike against Iraq will increase the influence of radicals [in Jordan],' said former Prime Minister Taher al-Masri. 'The feeling that the US is an enemy will be enhanced.'

Although Marwan Moasher, the Jordanian Foreign Minister, denied the presence of any American troops in his country, government sources confirmed that major manoeuvres involving the American and Jordanian forces took place in March. Moasher issued denials after the Lebanese daily Al Safir reported that 2,000 American forces in Jordan are preparing to carry out military operations against Iraq.

Observers point out that President George Bush has met King Abdullah of Jordan at least five times since taking office. The US is expected to double its aid to Jordan to $500m next year, and Congress is now considering a request by the administration to increase it by another $100m.

The American planners now believe only military force can remove Saddam from power. Earlier this year American intelligence operatives were sent to northern Iraq to gather information on Iraqi defences and gauge the fighting capability of the Kurdish militias. The Americans reconnoitred Iraqi frontline positions and requested maps of minefields from demining agencies working in the area. They decided the Kurds would be no match for the Republican Guard.

Some elements in the US administration still hope that disaffected military officers in Iraq can stage a coup. Next week about 70 former Iraqi officers will gather in London for the biggest dissidents' meeting yet to discuss the overthrow of the Iraqi President.

The US hopes some of them retain links with brother officers still in Iraq. The conference is being organised by a former brigadier, Tawfiq al-Yassiri, who took part in an uprising in the Babylon region south of Baghdad at the end of the Gulf war. The co-organiser of the conference is a former general, Saad Ubeidi, who was the Iraqi army's head of psychological operations.

The three-day conference will discuss ways of mobilising military efforts in support of political opposition to Saddam.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: JimSEA
What would causing a bloody rebellion accomplish, except that eventually the United States' participation in the revolution would be revealed, and it would only worsen our already deteriorating relationship with Middle Eastern countries. Instead, the United States should choose a very conservative course of action and try to avoid actively interfering in the region further, aside from providing routine financial support to our interests in Israel. Limited action is the only safe action.
41 posted on 07/06/2002 8:14:18 PM PDT by saxamaflob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
What happened to 'Loose lips sink ships?'
43 posted on 07/06/2002 9:00:27 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Flash News!

Scott from the Left Coast reports that leaked Pentagon plans state that Iraq will be attacked via Australia.

Tasmanian Wombats will infiltrate Saddam's bathroom while the "Thorpedo" will swim ashore near Basra and blind the enemy with his Gold Medals.

44 posted on 07/06/2002 9:01:29 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
Guess the attack will come from Air

Wouldn't it be more of a surprise if the attack came from Iran?

45 posted on 07/06/2002 9:02:44 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Old graphic, now he's a Wizard. Got the picture, Harry Potter?
46 posted on 07/06/2002 9:02:48 PM PDT by DemoSmear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Well, perhaps that's the amount of credence that should be given to the British tabloids.
47 posted on 07/06/2002 9:04:33 PM PDT by DemoSmear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Guess the attack will come from Air

Wouldn't it be more of a surprise if the attack came from Iran?

I was joking.. Air as in Air Jordan ;)

48 posted on 07/06/2002 9:12:02 PM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I would love to be a fly on the wall!
49 posted on 07/06/2002 9:22:06 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
The Brits don't have lips.
50 posted on 07/06/2002 9:22:59 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP
Thank you, I see that now. :)

However, since this country has overwhelming force, according to the President, they might be able to set up bases in Iran, in Iraq itself, and in Syria whether the current owners approve or not.

Hear that Saddam? There might be American and British bases inside Iraq already that you don't even know about and couldn't do anything about anyway.

51 posted on 07/06/2002 9:24:32 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Perhaps they didn't really close down that "Department of Misinformation" after all!
52 posted on 07/06/2002 9:24:36 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hellmouth
Actually, I would LOVE to send Ainge after Saddam. I would pity Saddam. Ainge is merciless.
53 posted on 07/06/2002 9:33:17 PM PDT by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vinomori
I think we should send in the Germans.They've had plenty of time off.This would give them an opportunity to square things with Israel.
54 posted on 07/06/2002 9:38:42 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Hopefully McHale will do better with the war then he is doing with the Timber Wolves!!
55 posted on 07/06/2002 9:42:42 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
However, since this country has overwhelming force, according to the President, they might be able to set up bases in Iran, in Iraq itself, and in Syria whether the current owners approve or not.

I think we need to liberate France as well :P

56 posted on 07/06/2002 10:08:26 PM PDT by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: saxamaflob
Sorry, my point was that it is not in our interest to have the Jordanian government embarassed, let alone overthrown. Whatever our plans are, the front pages of national and international newspapers is the last place they should appear for obvious reasons. However, the left wants to destroy anyone friendly to us regardless of the human cost. The left is about as cold and ruthless as you can get inspite of their pretence of "humanitarian concern".
57 posted on 07/06/2002 10:08:31 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"Darn, I knew that was from STARGATE which is one of the best semi-stupid movies ever."

Not to mention it was Mike Rivero's claim to fame. :)

58 posted on 07/06/2002 10:18:21 PM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
#52 I had the same thought.
59 posted on 07/06/2002 10:25:11 PM PDT by asneditor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Davea
LOL. BTW in that photo it looks like a couple of Irish troops will be behind him.

Heh, I know that player # 32 of the Boston Celtics is Kevin McHale. So that got to be an Irish name. I dunno about # 44 though.

60 posted on 07/06/2002 10:36:34 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson