Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
Then it comes down to what is meant by "vacuum." It might be necessary to add a term to the equations and that will disrupt their apparent canonical simplicity. That's the way it goes.

I think it goes even deeper than that. The speed of light is assumed to be constant on the basis that any observer anywhere who measures electrical and magnetic properties of a vacuum will get the same numbers. E.g., the electric field due to a unit of electrical charge is the same here as it is halfway across the universe.

If those properties can change from place to place, then the speed of light can likewise change, and an observer can detect his motion through a vacuum by monitoring its value. Who's to say they don't change?

64 posted on 08/08/2002 12:09:40 PM PDT by OBAFGKM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: OBAFGKM
Who's to say they don't change?

40 years ago when I got my degree in physics I asked those kinds of questions of my professors. They pointed out that there was an opportunity for me to make my mark in physics if I could answer those questions myself. Well, I didn't have the horsepower then, and got my degree anyway. But I still wonder.

68 posted on 08/08/2002 12:15:42 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson