[MoJo2001]

President Clinton seems more conservative because he didn't have a WAR ON TERRORISM. President Bush has had to make some very difficult situation. On the one hand, we have people complaining about civil liberties being discarded. On the other hand, we have people who are terrified about another attack. President Bush has to do the best he can to help us. The budget numbers that were given did not take the cost of war into account.

Thanks to Bill Clinton..we now have to defend our country from faceless, nameless, and cowards who would attack our country because he was getting serviced in the White House. What a disgrace for all those idiots that voted for him.

[pittsburgh gop guy]

Yawn.

[Red Jones]

the article is 100% correct

[swheats]

The better question would be, how much of the conservative agenda Clinton was able to accomplish with a Republican majority in the Senate and House, than Bush with a Democratic Senate majority?

[FreeReign]

Bush has signed a bill to regulate political speech...

Bush said that parts of the CFR bill were unconstitutional and he said he would let the courts take care of it.

protectionist taxes on imported steel...

In a time of war, the steel industry is most likely being protected for defense reasons. The media won't tell you that though because it doesn't fit their agenda.

[gcruse]

Who's the more fiscally conservative, Clinton or Bush?

Tariffs, agriwelfare...I don't want to think about it.

[lavaroise]

Waco, Elian, Ruby Ridge, IRS gate, FBI file gate, RonBrown gate, impeachment etc... Who would be so stupid as to compare anyone to CLinton?

[Nephi]

Clinton had the benefit of losing the congress to the Republicans in '94 and that saved him from himself.

Unfortunately, in Bush's desire to avoid everything Clintonesque to minimize reminding Americans of Clinton, he seems to have eschewed winning, too.

Therefore, thanks to Republicans in congress, Clinton's final one and a half terms were a success for conservatives.

[Kermit]

From '95 to 2001, Clinton had a GOP House and Senate. Bush has only had a GOP House. Bush has veered left and has not defended freedom, no doubt about that, but he's no Bill Clinton.

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

I don't know how a quote becomes "Quote of the Day" but I think this one needs to be posted around FR:

I really wish these people could decide on a story and stick to it; first he is too stupid to get out of bed; next, he is so crafty and cunning, he is going to take over the world; next, he is too stupid to pronounce big words; next, he is so sly, he was pulling the wool over everyone's eyes with complex business dealings; next, he is the goofy frat-boy, not ready for complex issues; now, he is the elitist, trying to make himself seem one of the guys.

22 posted on 8/11/02 3:46 PM Eastern by Paul Atreides

[AAABEST]

They're both part of the problem. They've both have made things worse for those of us who would like to see a more conservative, more free republic that adheres to our constitution.

Clinton was an evil self server. Bush is just a blueblooded jackass who never had conservative philosophy and couldn't buy one at a second hand conservative philosophy store.

They're both a net loss for freedom.