Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lightweight radiation-proof fabric unveiled
New Scientist ^ | 11-15-02 | Marina Murphy

Posted on 11/16/2002 7:06:52 PM PST by John Farson

The world's first lightweight radiation-proof fabric has been developed by a US company.

Called Demron, its potential applications range from lightweight full-body suits - which would allow the wearer to move unencumbered in high-radiation areas - to protective tents and radiation-proof linings for aircraft and spacecraft.

Traditional shielding relies on the presence of heavy metals, such as lead. But Demron is based on a polymer that mimics some of the electronic properties of these heavy metals, says John Hefler of Radiation Shield Technologies, the company in Miami, Florida, that is developing the material.

Its inventors claim that it provides protection comparable to the nuclear industry's standard-issue lead vest, blocking alpha, beta, gamma radiation and X-rays. Traditional protective clothing only protects against alpha radiation.

Electron cloud

Heavy metals have large atoms, and so have large numbers of electrons. When the particles that make up alpha and beta radiation collide with these electrons, they slow down, and are absorbed by the material.

The helium nuclei that make up alpha radiation have so little energy that almost any physical barrier can stop them. Gamma rays and X-rays are highly penetrating forms of electromagnetic radiation, which can only be stopped if the electrons in a shield's material can absorb enough of their energy.

Demron consists of a polyethylene and PVC-based polymer fused between two layers of a woven fabric. The polymer molecule has been designed so that incoming radiation will meet a large electron cloud, which will deflect or absorbed it.

"The molecules are lined up to give the illusion of the presence of large atoms," says Hefler. The electrons are capable of deflecting beta radiation or absorbing the energy of alpha radiation and X-rays.

The nuclear industry is still reserving judgement on the new material. "The potential usefulness of the fabric will depend on the level of protection it offers against gamma and X-rays, and how it reacts and degrades when subjected to radiation," says Janine Claber of British Nuclear Fuels.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: allyourdemron; arebelongtous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Actually, the principle is the same as with stealth materials. It's a "simple" matter of choosing the right materials; materials with properties that, when plugged into a set of equations, indicate an absorption band in the right part of the spectrum.

...and may the farce be with you.

21 posted on 11/16/2002 7:52:31 PM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
I wonder what would happen if I tried to wear one of these through airport security...
22 posted on 11/16/2002 7:54:53 PM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
<Interesting Demron Link
23 posted on 11/16/2002 7:55:12 PM PST by Bobber58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: error99
I wonder what would happen if I tried to wear one of these through airport security...

Wear a fez, look like an Eirab, and you're home free. Trust me, I smuggled through a suitcase nuke this way!

24 posted on 11/16/2002 7:57:28 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bobber58
Wonder if they're also marketing the updated version of the tinfoil hat?
25 posted on 11/16/2002 8:00:47 PM PST by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: fuente
The one an only product I saw menitioned on that site said "Radiation Protection: X-Ray, Low-Level Gamma, Beta, Alpha". Might buy beta, and alpha -- but x-ray and gamma? No way. No charges in those, and no way are the carbon molecules "electron clouds" a plasma energetic enough to sink gammas and x-rays.
26 posted on 11/16/2002 8:01:34 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
RON POPEIL'S NEW POCKET RADIATION SUIT

NOT AVAILABLE IN ANY STORE !

27 posted on 11/16/2002 8:01:51 PM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
and what part of the spectrum would that be?
28 posted on 11/16/2002 8:05:25 PM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
I bought a pair of prescription sunglasses. I could see fine, but in the office, a couple things had an almost imperceptable glimmer to them.

So tooling around that weekend, I had a hunch that something was wrong when the glimmer was much more pronounced. So, I looked through a pair of regular polarized shades.

Yep, one lens was fitted with the polarization 90 degrees off from the other.

However, when dealing with some things, especially new, I'm from the school of "heavy metal" engineering. At least where my life & limb are involved...

29 posted on 11/16/2002 8:29:02 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Farson

"Ha! And you thought Old Crusty was just an ugly pantsuit! Better get YOURS!!! 'Cause I never take mine OFF!!!"

30 posted on 11/16/2002 8:29:05 PM PST by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: error99
SELL all your tinfoil stock, IMMEDIATELY !
31 posted on 11/16/2002 8:31:47 PM PST by tbird1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jason Kauppinen
OK here's the deal. At room temps the electron density of Pb is ~4.5 times that of pure carbon, which is considerably higher than that of a woven polymer. It's electron and heavy nuclei density that shields one from high energy x/gamma radiation. The three basic mechanisms are Compton scattering (CS) and photo-electric effect(PEE) which are facilitated in the electron cloud, and pair production/annihilation (PPA) which is dependent on heavy nucleus density. Without a heavy nucleus, PPA doesn't exist. This is why Pb is so effective as a shield. If the cloud density is higher then CS and PPE are essentially more effective. This is somewhat of a simplification since I'm not going to discuss max penetration regions and such. Even if they could make some fabric as effective as Pb, it would have to be solid and two inches thick. Imagine wearing a suit with the density of water two inches thick. That would weigh a bunch.
32 posted on 11/16/2002 8:36:10 PM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John Farson
LI am very skeptical. Why? The efficiency of a material for absorbing radiation is a function of the atomic number. In other words, the higher the atomic number, the more efficient the material.
33 posted on 11/16/2002 8:50:30 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Call me crazy, but I had a real problem with this article from the first sentence. What the heck does "radiation-proof" mean??

Traditional protective clothing only protects against alpha radiation.

This sentence is factually wrong. Normal everyday clothing can shield out beta radiation. It's safe to put a beta radiation source in your pants pocket.

The problem that I have with this article is that it doesn't offer any kind of comparison of the shielding ability of this material versus lead, concrete, or steel. (That is, 1 inch of this new material has the equivalent shielding ability of ? inches of lead.)

This article has the same look and feel of the articles that surface on FR from time to time talking about motors that are 500% efficient, new hydrogen powered engines that can propel your car 5000 miles on a gallon of fuel, and therapy magnets that can cure cancer.

34 posted on 11/16/2002 8:57:29 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Mars then. Right. Off we go...
35 posted on 11/16/2002 9:17:54 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: punster
Yep. You need MASS to shield against gamma and x-ray radiation, that's why materials like lead, steel, and concrete are used.
36 posted on 11/16/2002 9:23:28 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; MaeWest
"It's safe to put a beta radiation source in your pants pocket."


Is that a beta radiation source in your pocket,
or are you just happy to see me?
37 posted on 11/17/2002 4:09:55 AM PST by error99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: error99
Is that a beta radiation source in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

Hey, watch it, Mr. Hot Pants.

38 posted on 11/18/2002 8:59:28 AM PST by MaeWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Want to weigh in on this issue?
39 posted on 11/18/2002 2:07:56 PM PST by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson