Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
In other words, the two major parties are fighting, not cooperating at every level to pursue a single goal.

They don't have to cooperate at every level, they just have to cooperate in the main, which they do. That was my point. There are *cosmetic* differences between the parties, which is how they get people to buy into it, but ultimately they seek the same thing, and appear to have chosen to seek it together (for the moment).

Tuor

294 posted on 11/27/2002 9:05:16 AM PST by Tuor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]


To: Tuor
"There are *cosmetic* differences between the parties, which is how they get people to buy into it, but ultimately they seek the same thing, and appear to have chosen to seek it together (for the moment)."

That's pure nonsense. Democrats are pro-choice. Republicans are pro-life. That's hardly "cosmetic".

Democrats want the Kyoto Treaty on Global Warming and they want the International Criminal Court. Republicans rolled both of those monstrosities back.

Likewise, the fight in the Senate over the 70 stalled judgeships is the antithesis of "cosmetic".

In your zest to view everything in America in a pro-third-party light, you've managed to miss some of the larger ideological wars of the last 40 years.

295 posted on 11/27/2002 11:26:41 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson