Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anchor (Ashleigh Banfield): Coverage was biased
The Topeka Capital-Journal ^ | 04/24/2003 | Matt Moline

Posted on 04/25/2003 1:16:19 AM PDT by KQQL

MANHATTAN -- War's sobering realities never reached American TV screens during the recent U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, according to NBC News correspondent Ashleigh Banfield.

"We didn't see what happen when Marines fired M-16s," Banfield said during a Landon lecture appearance Thursday at Kansas State University. "We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There were horrors that were completely left out of this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?"

On the other hand, she said, many U.S. television viewers were treated to a non-stop flow of images presented by "cable news operators who wrap themselves in the American flag and go after a certain target demographic."

Ashleigh Banfield"It was a grand and glorious picture that had a lot of people watching, " Banfield said, "and a lot of advertisers excited about cable TV news. But it wasn't journalism, because I'm not sure Americans are hesitant to do this again -- to fight another war, because it looked to them like a courageous and terrific endeavor."

Banfield's appearance at K-State's McCain Auditorium marked the 129th speech in the long-running Landon Lecture series, which was established in 1966 by the late Kansas Gov. Alfred M. Landon.

In addition to her duties at NBC, Banfield also hosts the popular MSNBC cable TV news show, "MSNBC Investigates."

Until last fall, Banfield anchored her own MSNBC news program, "Ashleigh Banfield: On Location," a program that included a stop last summer in Manhattan, where the Canadian-born host interviewed K-State experts who have developed methods to protect the nation's food supply from potential bioterrorism threats.

Since 9-11, Banfield has frequently reported news stories relating to the Bush administration's "war on terrorism" from the Middle East, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Syria and Lebanon.

In her lecture, Banfield noted inconsistences in the Bush administration's announced war aims in Iraq, beginning with the original U.S. pre-war contention that Iraqi tyrant Saddam Hussein's alleged stockpile of chemical and biological weapons posed a serious international threat.

"Conveniently, in the week or two we were in there, it became a message of 'freeing the Iraqi people,' " Banfield said. "That should have been the message early on, in fact, six to eight months preceding this campaign, if we were trying to win over the hearts of the Arab world."

According to Banfield, U.S. broadcasters don't accurately inform the American public of the basic reason behind widespread Islamic distrust of the U.S. -- the American government's continued unwillingness to treat Israelis and Palestinians as equal partners in the future of Israel.

"As a journalist, I have been ostracized just from going on television and saying, 'Here's what the leaders of Hezbollah, a radical Muslim group, are telling me about what is needed to bring peace to Israel,' " she said. "And, 'Here's what the Lebanese are saying.' Like it or lump it, don't shoot the messenger, but that's what they do."

An audience of about 500 attended Banfield's lecture, the last event in this season's Landon Lecture series.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: completetwit; majortwit; televisedwar; twit; uttertwit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: KQQL
"We didn't see what happen when Marines fired M-16s," Banfield said during a Landon lecture appearance Thursday at Kansas State University. "We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There were horrors that were completely left out of this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?"

Well, I guess if she was was really dedicated she could have volunteered to be on the receiving end. Oh wait-that would have dangerous?

21 posted on 04/25/2003 4:31:30 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY
Let's try this again-

Well, I guess if she was was really dedicated to journalism, she could have volunteered to be on the receiving end. Oh wait-that would have been dangerous?

22 posted on 04/25/2003 4:42:29 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
The article doesn't mention how she was received by the audience.
23 posted on 04/25/2003 4:56:49 AM PDT by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
Peter's cousin?

or illegitimate daughter?

24 posted on 04/25/2003 5:54:11 AM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Another honest, unbiased, earnest Canadian.

is there anyway to physically separate the US from Canada? I got a chainsaw, I'm gonna go get started in Windsor, right near a cigar store with a huge picture of brother Fidel in the window. They loooove Cuba over there.

25 posted on 04/25/2003 6:03:20 AM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Well we'll strap a camera to your keister and when we fire off a round you run up for the explosion.
26 posted on 04/25/2003 6:08:47 AM PDT by TomHarkinIsNotFromIowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Well, Ms. Banfield, I remember seeing dead Iraqi soldiers lying on the ground. I assume this was from the bullets fired from that M-16.

Question for you Ms. Banfield: Did you KNOW that when a soldier fires an M-16, the bullet will kill Iraqi soldiers?
27 posted on 04/25/2003 6:14:25 AM PDT by Bryan24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"We didn't see what happen when Marines fired M-16s... We didn't see what happened after mortars landed, only the puff of smoke. There were horrors that were completely left out of this war. So was this journalism? Or was this coverage?"

There's no TV "coverage" of what happens during abortions on TV, either.

But I doubt Ms. Banfield protests the "horrors that were completely left out" in "journalistic" discussions of abortion.

28 posted on 04/25/2003 6:14:48 AM PDT by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
What a twit. CANDAIAN--that figures. Sounds like she would be right at home at Al Jazeera.
29 posted on 04/25/2003 6:22:49 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Ashleigh Banfield is so freakin hot!!
30 posted on 04/25/2003 6:24:18 AM PDT by jonalvy44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
NBC News correspondent Ashleigh Banfield

Ashleigh Banfield started her career in broadcasting in Kenora, Ontario (a town located on the north shore of Lake of the Woods ... 200 miles, or so, east of Winnipeg). She then moved up to a larger audience when she went to work for a TV station in Winnipeg. Don't recall the rest of her progression up to her present position, but the term "info babe" definite1y applies here ... now she's on the college lecture circuit ... go figure.

31 posted on 04/25/2003 6:25:00 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
LOL, is that really is that what the Arabs want. Seems to me the Arabs have been hell bent to push the Jews into the sea from day 1.

Yes, Ashleigh...what did the Arabs "want" when they attacked Israel in 1967...at a time when they occupied ALL of the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan, and ALL of Jerusalem--and all Jews were forbidden from stepping foot there. Were they angry at the lack of a "peace process" then?

32 posted on 04/25/2003 6:25:14 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
She was pissed that MSNBC kept her stateside during the war and that she lost the co-billing on "Holt and Banfield".
33 posted on 04/25/2003 6:27:56 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jonalvy44
Maybe so, but isn't she the one who changed her hair color to be taken more seriously?
34 posted on 04/25/2003 6:30:24 AM PDT by fml (freedom begins with W!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: onyx
But she's smart...she wears really kool glasses.
35 posted on 04/25/2003 6:33:25 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (Proud that Rick Santorum is my Senator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
K-State really stuck it in Alf Landon's eye this time. They generally have former heads of state, ex-presidents, senators, etc. Banfield is just a third string talking head, they must have been desperate or dillusional to put her on.
36 posted on 04/25/2003 6:37:32 AM PDT by heckler (wiskey for my men, beer for my horses ,sexy for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
According to Banfield, U.S. broadcasters don't accurately inform the American public of the basic reason behind widespread Islamic distrust of the U.S. -- the American government's continued unwillingness to treat Israelis and Palestinians as equal partners in the future of Israel.

The American government's continued unwillingness to treat Israelis and Palestinians as equal partners in the future of Israel may in fact be real. But U.S. broadcasters have been all to efficient in informing the American public of the real reason. The Palestinians desire to see every Israeli man, woman and child wiped from the face of the Earth by any means possible. At least, to me that message is all too clear when they report on all the bombings and shootings.

37 posted on 04/25/2003 6:37:41 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Has she ever gone into an abortion clinic and done a graphic story about what goes on in there?
38 posted on 04/25/2003 6:45:22 AM PDT by techcor (Admin Moderator wannabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
'Here's what the leaders of Hezbollah, a radical Muslim group, are telling me about what is needed to bring peace to Israel,...

I'll bet dollars to donuts none of her reports ever referred to Hezbollah as a "radical Muslim group".

39 posted on 04/25/2003 6:56:50 AM PDT by JimRed (Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"Conveniently, in the week or two we were in there, it became a message of 'freeing the Iraqi people,' " Banfield said. "That should have been the message early on, in fact, six to eight months preceding this campaign, if we were trying to win over the hearts of the Arab world."

No, every time Bush spoke about Iraq, he discussed both WMD and the plight of the Iraqi people. Banfield is a liar.

40 posted on 04/25/2003 7:14:24 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson