Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question: Why are parts of the US Const. crossed out/italicized?
sdj7x7

Posted on 07/13/2003 6:19:50 PM PDT by sdk7x7

Hello FReepers,

Hopefully one of you can help me out... I've been doing some research on the Constitution (yes, believe it or not, there actually IS one that some of us on the Right like to at least try to adhere to)... Anyway, I'm interested in knowing why certain parts of the Constitution are crossed out/italicized and I'd appreciate a link to any online version of the Const. that displays such crossouts/italics.

Thanks for your help in advance... Semper Fi, -sdk


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 07/13/2003 6:19:51 PM PDT by sdk7x7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Those parts have been repealed and or modified via amendment.
2 posted on 07/13/2003 6:22:02 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
United States Constitution.
3 posted on 07/13/2003 6:22:18 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Here's an online source that rather than crossing out modified clauses instead provides a hyperlink to the relevant amendment.

The Constitution of the United States of America

4 posted on 07/13/2003 6:24:38 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Book her, Dano.
>

Support the finest site on the web. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


5 posted on 07/13/2003 6:24:43 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Or just no longer are in effect, e.g. the initial apportionment of representatives.
6 posted on 07/13/2003 6:27:08 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
The U.S. Supreme Court got a hold of it(Our Beloved U.S. Constitution), that's why!!!!
7 posted on 07/13/2003 6:29:09 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
#7. Justice Scalia excluded. He stood up and fought for States Rights(10th Amendment)!!!!
8 posted on 07/13/2003 6:44:56 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
You may want to get a copy of an annotated U.S. Constitution. It'll tell you the reasons clauses were modified.
9 posted on 07/13/2003 6:49:23 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Got an example? website? You got my curiosity piqued!
10 posted on 07/13/2003 6:58:27 PM PDT by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/constitution/toc.html
11 posted on 07/13/2003 7:03:19 PM PDT by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Some parts of the Constitution have been changed or are no longer in effect. (remember, back then, things like slavery, etc existed) Through ammendmends and the Bill of Rights, parts were changed, altered, or just made ineffective. Words in ittalics or words crossed out are no longer in use but are kept for historical value.

I know because we did a LONG study on the Constitution last year. Pretty interesting though...*ramble*
12 posted on 07/13/2003 7:05:11 PM PDT by 4mycountry (Over-achiever extraordinare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7; 4ConservativeJustices; Ff--150; stainlessbanner
Wait a minute!! We still have one of those?!? I just thought the national government told us what was good for us now
13 posted on 07/13/2003 7:08:12 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Must be because of Campaign Finance Reform. Thank Bush.
14 posted on 07/13/2003 7:09:06 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Anyway, I'm interested in knowing why certain parts of the Constitution are crossed out/italicized and I'd appreciate a link to any online version of the Const. that displays such crossouts/italics

No such copy exists. Maybe a draft that wasn't adopted has such markings, but the official document certainly doesn't.

15 posted on 07/13/2003 7:15:36 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Satadru
Campaign Finance Reform??

I just put McCain on my Democrat Presidential Candidate page! :>)

http://www.arkansas2004.com
16 posted on 07/13/2003 7:23:17 PM PDT by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 4mycountry
My son has to recite a randomly-selected passage, or amendment, verbatim and with punctuation, and explaining it in modern english, each saturday - or no allowance.
17 posted on 07/13/2003 7:32:40 PM PDT by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steplock
Same answer as to the creator of this thread. Portions of the Constitution (and its amendments) that have been superceded by legitimate amendment are shown as strike-outs. Protions that have been added the same way are shown in italitcs. And, BTW, legitimate amendments mean those that have been promogated and ratified as stated in Article V. "Amendments" by force of Supreme Court decisions are not included in the text of the Constitution.

This has been a standard typesetting way to reflect such changes since ten of the twelve items of the Bill of Rights were ratified in 1791. Nothing new or exceptional here.

Congressman Billybob

Latest article, now up FR, "Fear and Loathing in the Supreme Court."

18 posted on 07/13/2003 7:38:10 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sdk7x7
Currently the following parts of the Constitution are not applicable any longer:

[Beginning with]"We The People ......

[Ending with] .... In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,

All other parts are in full force and effect.
19 posted on 07/13/2003 7:40:12 PM PDT by ido_now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patton
*gasps* Oh you cruel person!! My heart goes out to your kid!!

Seriously, that will help him learn the Constitution--but don't be surprised if in 20 or so years (depending on how old he is) he's lying on a couch in a shrink's office, saying, "It all started 20 years ago with my mom/dad..." ;)
20 posted on 07/13/2003 7:51:23 PM PDT by 4mycountry (Over-achiever extraordinare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson