Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second U.S. Judge Blocks 'Do-Not-Call' List
Fox News ^ | http://www.foxnews.com/

Posted on 09/25/2003 4:10:17 PM PDT by Hotdog

War of the laws?...whats next?


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: donotcalllist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-408 next last
To: Professional
Professional, I'm beginning to understand you simce last night..... You are RIGHT and 50,000,000 PEOPLE are WRONG!
....NOT!
101 posted on 09/25/2003 5:37:25 PM PDT by Y.R.WeesoStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
I just left a voice mail with his secretary:

Me too.

Nottingham Edward Us District Judge
1929 Stout St
Denver, CO 80294
303-844-5018 - Press 5 to reach Judge Knothead’s Secretary.

102 posted on 09/25/2003 5:37:36 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: grayout
But would it bother you?
103 posted on 09/25/2003 5:41:15 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Y.R.WeesoStupid
Just because everyone, most, think it's a good idea, doesn't make it LEGAL. If they had a do not put a commercial on TV list, I guarantee you, you'd have at least 50 million folks on that thing too.

Lots of otherwise smart people at FR haven't bothered looking a bit further as to WHY this is illegal and why it would have serious ramifications on our economy.

As a Financial Advisor in a solid position, my competition would be wiped out by this legislation. I personally benefit from this law.... BUT it is BAD law, and a BAD idea.

Sorry to be the one person saying the Emperor has no clothes.
104 posted on 09/25/2003 5:41:46 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
A company, without this law, has to comply with a slew of many existing laws. Chances are, the companies that are really bugging you, are already in violation of Federal and State laws. This was just another law, on top of the last law. Something our govt is very good at.
105 posted on 09/25/2003 5:43:13 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Professional
Bad for you, Good for the rest of us. No, Commercials wouldn't be left out because we would all have to pay more to watch TV.
106 posted on 09/25/2003 5:44:11 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: Professional
Previously, companies had to have their own "do not call list" but it was hard to regulate when the company says "you never told us to put you on that list". A do not call registry clears that one up.
108 posted on 09/25/2003 5:48:28 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: grayout
If everyone's drive way blocked, including yours, everyday, then what would you do?
109 posted on 09/25/2003 5:50:21 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Total bullcrap. I own the phone, I pay for it, all the DNCall list does it give me a CHOICE to limit the type of calls allowed to come into MY PHONE. "

Just off the top of my head, what if you don’t want blacks to “come into MY PHONE” or into my business? After all, you own your business too. What if congress votes to support that? Is it constitutional?

More realistically, what if some day, congress votes to limit what some PC committee calls hate speech (i.e. conservatism) from playing on the TV that you also paid for?

I haven’t thought this through, but on its face, this law was just too easy. I suspect that a constitutional amendment would be required to bypass first amendment protections for cold callers.

110 posted on 09/25/2003 5:51:10 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Professional
Just because everyone, most, think it's a good idea, doesn't make it LEGAL. If they had a do not put a commercial on TV list, I guarantee you, you'd have at least
50 million folks on that thing too.

Terrible logic! It's two different things. I can't "turn off" my phone for fear some of my family may need my help!
If I choose to turn on the TV, I agree to be bombarded by advertising. If I DON'T answer my phone, someone who really needs to talk to me, may pay a dear price. It's obvious who you favor on this issue! Let Congress MAKE it legal and while they're at it, they can tell the Judicial Branch to stay out of the Legislative Branch's beeswax!
111 posted on 09/25/2003 5:52:43 PM PDT by Y.R.WeesoStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
And you don't think your phone bill would absolutely skyrocket without businesses using them for soliciting business? C'mon? The phone company probably gets 20-30% of it's revs from them. That's the part that ALMOST makes them profitable!
112 posted on 09/25/2003 5:52:44 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Maybe Congress should retaliate by threatening to strip Federal judges to find someone in contempt of court for interrupting during courtroom proceedings. Would be a bad law, but maybe get their attention with the clear parallel of denying someone control over their domain.

No, the only correct solution is impeachment. They should start with the Supreme Court justices who reread the Constitution until they could find pornography and sodomy in its pages.

113 posted on 09/25/2003 5:53:48 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Certified letter to a company is all it takes. Can do that with unwanted junk mail too. Get another call, or letter, and BLAMMO!
114 posted on 09/25/2003 5:54:04 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Professional
And you don't think your phone bill would absolutely skyrocket without businesses using them for soliciting business? C'mon? The phone company probably gets
20-30% of it's revs from them. That's the part that ALMOST makes them profitable!


..and that's the worst BS you've come up with thus far!
115 posted on 09/25/2003 5:55:23 PM PDT by Y.R.WeesoStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Professional
And you don't think your phone bill would absolutely skyrocket without businesses using them for soliciting business? C'mon? The phone company probably gets
20-30% of it's revs from them. That's the part that ALMOST makes them profitable!


..and that's the worst BS you've come up with thus far!
116 posted on 09/25/2003 5:55:32 PM PDT by Y.R.WeesoStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
Your imagination is taking you to the reality of why this thing is a bad idea, and why our court system is protecting us, from .... us.
117 posted on 09/25/2003 5:55:44 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
What if CNN turned your TV on and forced your TV to turn to their Channel? There is a difference in speech here.
118 posted on 09/25/2003 5:56:03 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Total bullcrap. I own the phone, I pay for it, all the DNCall list does it give me a CHOICE to limit the type of calls allowed to come into MY PHONE.

Exactly right.

This is no different than putting a 'No Solicitors' sign on your front door.

119 posted on 09/25/2003 5:56:13 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Y.R.WeesoStupid
Yeah, the phone companies don't make any meaningful money of the telemarketing industry. Yeah, that's the ticket. Losing that business would have little or no effect on them, and your bill...
120 posted on 09/25/2003 5:57:13 PM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson