I know we disagree in many areas and I use to watch Scot when he was televised in NY. He would get near telling his story and than pull back I found him teasing folks.
The only reason I listen him because he talked about the 12 tribes - there are other s that do this and each have their agenda, and yes the Christian Identity is racist
All I can say is I being considered a real persona non-gratis for my beliefs LDS, but that is the person who judges me problem.
I admire your effort to share this knowledge now I don't if you are anti any of the tribes so far as I have read that is not so.
The traditional believer has for so long just accepted what was told down through the age with out examine the what the scriptures really say.
I quote this often-
The name indicated first of all a man of the kingdom of Judah, as distinguished from persons belonging to the northern kingdom of Israel. Its first chronological occurrence in the Bible is in 2 Kgs. 16: 6, about 740 B.C. It has become customary to use the word Jew to refer to all the descendants of Jacob, but this is a mistake. It would be limited to those of the kingdom of Judah or, more especially today, those of the tribe of Judah and his associates. Thus all Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are Jews, because there are descendants of the other tribes of Israel also upon the earth.
What I don’t understand it here on this planet it like closed door you either repeat the words of the sacred cow or your views need not apply. I thought the Quest was to learn about the truth of our Creator and take responsibility for honoring right and not give a hoot for those who will castigate one for not perpetuating the party line.
For me I fear the Lord more than man.
My heart goes out for Sharon and his leadership. I wish the world was differend, it pains me to see how media lies and distort this situation, but as we know Judah is apart of the Lord children an as shown in-
ZECHARIAH 13
The Jews shall gain forgiveness at the Second Coming—They shall ask Jesus: What are these wounds in thine hands?—The remnant, tried and refined, shall be his people.
Hi there! Good to hear from you again.
>I use to watch Scot
To the extent that He agrees with Me and my own very extensive research, much of it overseas, I refer to his work on the Lost Tribes as a reference in my Profile. His site is very extensive, generally well done, and is an excellent reference for very patient and discerning scholars. Beyond that, He is not my problem.
>All I can say is I being considered a real persona non-gratis for my beliefs LDS
Not with me? We may not agree on everything, but that's no reason to be disagreeable. If we all agreed on everything, what's the point of meeting here to talk about it???
>I admire your effort to share this knowledge now I don't if you are anti any of the tribes so far as I have read that is not so.
Thank You. I am not anti-anybody. I'm just looking for the truth, and having fun doing it.
>The traditional believer has for so long just accepted what was told down through the age with out examine the what the scriptures really say.
Anything we can do to get people into their Bibles is effort well spent.
>It has become customary to use the word Jew to refer to all the descendants of Jacob, but this is a mistake. It would be limited to those of the kingdom of Judah or, more especially today, those of the tribe of Judah and his associates. Thus all Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are Jews, because there are descendants of the other tribes of Israel also upon the earth.
100% Correct! Different scholars do come up with different dates for the first use of the name "jew". Some think it was when the Kingdoms split ~922 BC, others go with your date ~740 BC, while others insist it was when the ~50,000 from the Southern Kingdom returned from the Babylonian captivity about 500 BC. Any of those dates is fine with me, since none have any effect on the Northern Kingdom, which is my primary interest. <ggg>.
>What I don’t understand it here on this planet it like closed door you either repeat the words of
the sacred cow or your views need not apply.
Anything to do with religion or politics brings out strong feelings. I try to keep my research into the Lost Tribes of Israel as Historical as possible, even while using the Bible as a major (but not exclusive) historical source. I don't think the Holy Bible was ever intended to be an all-inclusive History Book. It has a more important purpose than that.
> I fear the Lord more than man.
ME TOO!!! (The fear of the Lord is the beginning of Wisdom.)
-Regards LT
Excellent, Restornu. "What the scriptures really say," is what is of primary importance.
I quote this often-
Can you give the source for this quotation?
I thought the Quest was to learn about the truth of our Creator and take responsibility for honoring right and not give a hoot for those who will castigate one for not perpetuating the party line.
I assume that you mean the Creator of the Universe (everything) Who is described in the Holy Bible, and none other. Actually, it is to "..love God and keep His commandments, for this is the whole duty of man."
(Ecclesiastes 12:13)
For me I fear the Lord more than man.
Excellent, R. "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom."
(Psalm 111:10); (Proverbs 9:10)
DG