Replies

#1- the man who wrote this is not a Calvinist or he would believe in limited atonement.

#2 Your comments on this thread are very unbecoming for a minister of the gospel. Not only are you misrepresenting Calvinism, but even the title is a misrepresentation of what we believe. We have no idea how many God elected. He could have elected everyone for all we know. Your "select few" terminology is a deliberate misrepresentation, no, it is a lie and I am quite frankly getting very tired of the Arminians misrepresenting Calvinism with their ugly Satanic venom (what else can you call the mean spiritedness in comments. NOTE: Calvinists can yield to the flesh and the devil just as well as Arminians. I'm just calling them as I am seeing them at the current moment). You had better pray you are right about everything because you are not engaging in debate or discourse but insults and deliberate devisiveness of which the Christ who called for unity would not be pleased.

believe in limited atonement= Your "select few" terminology is a deliberate misrepresentation

I thought this IS Calvinism!?

Select many - reject few........ is that better?

#1. The guy is a 4 point calvinist. REad the article and see his deference toward Calvin. He is not the only calvinist around who rejects "limited atonement."

#2. I'm not trying to be divisive. I'm trying to be part of the solution that topples calvinism from the stage of Christian History. I think it's bad theology.

Please note that that is not directed at you personally. I've discussed with you in the past and find you an able combatant, one who knows her subject, and most importantly, I consider you a Christian.